2.5 sec in total
694 ms
1.7 sec
57 ms
Click here to check amazing Branshaw content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about branshaw.co
Bookkeeping, tax preparation, and business advisory services. Branshaw Accounting adapts our services to fit the needs of your business.
Visit branshaw.coWe analyzed Branshaw.co page load time and found that the first response time was 694 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
branshaw.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value1,090 ms
24/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
694 ms
45 ms
42 ms
447 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Branshaw.co, 31% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (694 ms) belongs to the original domain Branshaw.co.
Page size can be reduced by 342.1 kB (42%)
823.8 kB
481.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Branshaw.co main page is 823.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 352.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 272.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 272.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Branshaw images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 61.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.9 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)
26
16
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Branshaw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.branshaw.co
694 ms
minified.js
45 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
42 ms
polyfill.min.js
447 ms
thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js
37 ms
main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js
98 ms
lodash.min.js
37 ms
react.production.min.js
97 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
100 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
98 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
97 ms
11062b_bc016da29c8b4da282f4052c9a538621f000.jpg
63 ms
051375_643e604d8f414a488fa2a21de7f12eeb~mv2.png
463 ms
035244_42d2c3e1d23a4802b2f590fb31a2fb47~mv2.png
235 ms
035244_41b52d13bf344b739924040d4ac6b270~mv2.png
218 ms
035244_eb7fe156e1c04135bae4272712beb056~mv2.png
110 ms
035244_ccf756246f254303bfa1359f84796fde~mv2.png
111 ms
1e47b2_cd5df08585b64f40a575e620ed3bf997.jpg
110 ms
f0af4840c5704569b1bd7daeeb2589a9.jpg
112 ms
109702687f5c4c38986333623d19b652.jpg
117 ms
11062b_0002142444534490b950a8797535371df000.jpg
115 ms
051375_643e604d8f414a488fa2a21de7f12eeb~mv2.png
452 ms
bundle.min.js
79 ms
129 ms
118 ms
122 ms
125 ms
120 ms
117 ms
161 ms
163 ms
153 ms
163 ms
153 ms
146 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
17 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
5 ms
branshaw.co accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
branshaw.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
branshaw.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Branshaw.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Branshaw.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
branshaw.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Branshaw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: