Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 62

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

225 ms

Resources Loaded

541 ms

Page Rendered

420 ms

bravodate.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bravodate content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bravodate.com

Visit bravodate.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bravodate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 225 ms and then it took 961 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bravodate.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.735

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bravodate.com

225 ms

css

159 ms

chunk-vendors.3205499c.js

193 ms

app.3efaae36.js

183 ms

bravodateCss.582380c8.js

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Bravodate.com, 33% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (225 ms) belongs to the original domain Bravodate.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 958 B (54%)

Content Size

1.8 kB

After Optimization

822 B

In fact, the total size of Bravodate.com main page is 1.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 958 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 822 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 958 B or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (50%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bravodate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bravodate.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

bravodate.com best practices score

62

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the notification permission on page load

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

bravodate.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bravodate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bravodate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bravodate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: