2.9 sec in total
91 ms
2 sec
772 ms
Click here to check amazing Breach Check content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about breachcheck.io
Breach Check will tell you which passwords and PII are exposed through data breaches on the darkweb so you can take action and protect yourself!
Visit breachcheck.ioWe analyzed Breachcheck.io page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
breachcheck.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value5.4 s
55/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
91 ms
115 ms
110 ms
24 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Breachcheck.io, 16% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (902 ms) belongs to the original domain Breachcheck.io.
Page size can be reduced by 137.0 kB (21%)
641.6 kB
504.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Breachcheck.io main page is 641.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 257.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Breachcheck.io has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (75%)
71
18
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Breach Check. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
breachcheck.io
91 ms
breachcheck.io
115 ms
gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css
110 ms
gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css
24 ms
gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css
127 ms
style.min.css
26 ms
edd-blocks.css
117 ms
styles.css
32 ms
edd.min.css
36 ms
styles.css
41 ms
intlTelInput.css
29 ms
full-styles.6.10.2.css
47 ms
mkhb-render.css
53 ms
mkhb-row.css
58 ms
mkhb-column.css
63 ms
js_composer.min.css
84 ms
theme-options-production-1657047240.css
78 ms
formreset.min.css
101 ms
formsmain.min.css
101 ms
readyclass.min.css
106 ms
browsers.min.css
108 ms
shortcodes-styles.min.css
286 ms
style.css
112 ms
webfontloader.js
132 ms
jquery.min.js
133 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
253 ms
intlTelInput.min.js
27 ms
jquery.json.min.js
255 ms
gravityforms.min.js
209 ms
utils.min.js
136 ms
animate.min.css
136 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
145 ms
index.js
149 ms
index.js
157 ms
edd-ajax.js
161 ms
jscookie.min.js
175 ms
app.js
170 ms
smoothscroll.js
186 ms
full-scripts.6.10.2.js
187 ms
mkhb-render.js
180 ms
mkhb-column.js
181 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
183 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
183 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
312 ms
dom-ready.min.js
173 ms
hooks.min.js
176 ms
i18n.min.js
184 ms
a11y.min.js
176 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
171 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
152 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
168 ms
shortcodes-scripts.min.js
160 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
308 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
335 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
167 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
169 ms
css
52 ms
close_button.svg
674 ms
icon_emails.svg
222 ms
dark-logo.svg
28 ms
logo.svg
655 ms
home_header_img.svg
30 ms
breachcheck_home_img1.svg
56 ms
breachcheck_home_img2.svg
137 ms
breachcheck_home_img3.svg
902 ms
breachcheck_home_img4.svg
227 ms
breachcheck_home_img5.svg
732 ms
breachcheck_home_img6.svg
379 ms
breachcheck_home_img7.svg
590 ms
breachcheck_home_img8.svg
656 ms
logo-white.svg
673 ms
bottom_angle_white.svg
705 ms
square_angle_bg.svg
703 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8sDE3U3f4c.ttf
618 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tdE3U3f4c.ttf
617 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tvE3U3f4c.ttf
617 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8uDFHU3f4c.ttf
599 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8u6FHU3f4c.ttf
617 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8vdFHU3f4c.ttf
617 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8v0FHU3f4c.ttf
618 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf
618 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
620 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
620 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf
620 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
620 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf
621 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf
620 ms
breachcheck.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
breachcheck.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
breachcheck.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Breachcheck.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Breachcheck.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
breachcheck.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Breach Check. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: