Tools & Wizards About Us
bridegroommatch.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

bridegroommatch.com

最好看2019日本中文字幕_激情偷乱人伦小说图片在线_人人澡人人添人人澡_九色国产精品视频

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

bridegroommatch.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bridegroommatch content for Sri Lanka. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bridegroommatch.com

最好看2019日本中文字幕_激情偷乱人伦小说图片在线_人人澡人人添人人澡_九色国产精品视频_91久久久久又粗又黄视频_精品亚洲AV无码一区二区三区天_国产精品日韩精品

Visit bridegroommatch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bridegroommatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bridegroommatch.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

bridegroommatch.com

206 ms

www.bridegroommatch.com

737 ms

bootstrap.min.css

201 ms

font-awesome.min.css

6 ms

floating-share.css

147 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Bridegroommatch.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to O.twimg.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (837 ms) belongs to the original domain Bridegroommatch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 640.7 kB (27%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bridegroommatch.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 84.3 kB

  • Original 104.5 kB
  • After minification 91.5 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 108.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bridegroommatch images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 257.3 kB

  • Original 401.8 kB
  • After minification 393.3 kB
  • After compression 144.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.3 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 191.2 kB

  • Original 226.3 kB
  • After minification 205.4 kB
  • After compression 35.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bridegroommatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 191.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (38%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

56

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridegroommatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bridegroommatch.com

bridegroommatch.com

206 ms

www.bridegroommatch.com

www.bridegroommatch.com

737 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

201 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

6 ms

floating-share.css

floating-share.css

147 ms

style.css

style.css

155 ms

bgmstyle.css

bgmstyle.css

140 ms

nivo-slider.min.css

nivo-slider.min.css

150 ms

reg_pricing_table_style.css

reg_pricing_table_style.css

146 ms

jquery-2.1.4.js

jquery-2.1.4.js

277 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

346 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

290 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

229 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

229 ms

bgmscript.js

bgmscript.js

267 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

382 ms

reg-main.js

reg-main.js

278 ms

reg-main1.js

reg-main1.js

385 ms

reg-main2.js

reg-main2.js

385 ms

jquery.floating-share.js

jquery.floating-share.js

384 ms

nav-bg.jpg

nav-bg.jpg

146 ms

logo.png

logo.png

147 ms

home-icon.png

home-icon.png

241 ms

log1.png

log1.png

239 ms

cont11.png

cont11.png

239 ms

SLIDEry73k.jpeg

SLIDEry73k.jpeg

714 ms

SLIDE7p6n8.jpeg

SLIDE7p6n8.jpeg

532 ms

SLIDEmmfs8.jpeg

SLIDEmmfs8.jpeg

700 ms

SLIDEjtg76.jpeg

SLIDEjtg76.jpeg

532 ms

3063-Pbx7rm.jpeg

3063-Pbx7rm.jpeg

305 ms

2995-Pyz48p.jpeg

2995-Pyz48p.jpeg

369 ms

1865-P459qn.jpeg

1865-P459qn.jpeg

382 ms

3707-Pqmk8v.jpeg

3707-Pqmk8v.jpeg

381 ms

3070-P4t3vj.jpeg

3070-P4t3vj.jpeg

475 ms

3085-P5mxkz.jpeg

3085-P5mxkz.jpeg

528 ms

free.png

free.png

537 ms

star.png

star.png

616 ms

recommend1.png

recommend1.png

623 ms

104-102-Ssmqtn.jpeg

104-102-Ssmqtn.jpeg

697 ms

successstory-pic2.jpg

successstory-pic2.jpg

670 ms

1385-Pxn2sf.jpeg

1385-Pxn2sf.jpeg

698 ms

2006-Pssp3h.jpeg

2006-Pssp3h.jpeg

708 ms

Thirugnana_%20Sambantham_%20Photo.JPG

Thirugnana_%20Sambantham_%20Photo.JPG

723 ms

1991-Pmjy3z.jpeg

1991-Pmjy3z.jpeg

707 ms

607-Pgfgvf.jpeg

607-Pgfgvf.jpeg

726 ms

987-P54yy4.jpeg

987-P54yy4.jpeg

726 ms

1870-Pph92h.jpeg

1870-Pph92h.jpeg

837 ms

imageName.jpg

imageName.jpg

714 ms

anotherOne.jpg

anotherOne.jpg

737 ms

blahblahblah.jpg

blahblahblah.jpg

732 ms

more-icon.jpg

more-icon.jpg

732 ms

search-icon.jpg

search-icon.jpg

737 ms

photo-bg.png

photo-bg.png

784 ms

social-sprite-v4.png

social-sprite-v4.png

778 ms

all.js

all.js

110 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

112 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

763 ms

www.jqueryscript.net

www.jqueryscript.net

60 ms

count.json

count.json

75 ms

share

share

177 ms

18107.htm

18107.htm

155 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

85 ms

timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js

timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js

219 ms

177 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

171 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

207 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

40 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

132 ms

ga.js

ga.js

52 ms

photo.jpg

photo.jpg

79 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

28 ms

syndication

syndication

175 ms

406319196125929472

406319196125929472

420 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

17 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

55 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

121 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

81 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

34 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

30 ms

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

42 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

29 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

29 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

404page.php

404page.php

190 ms

404page.php

404page.php

187 ms

404page.php

404page.php

227 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

32 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

28 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

26 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

25 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

29 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

29 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

30 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

32 ms

proxy.jpg

proxy.jpg

31 ms

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

33 ms

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css

57 ms

Accessibility Review

bridegroommatch.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bridegroommatch.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bridegroommatch.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridegroommatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bridegroommatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bridegroommatch.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bridegroommatch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: