4.8 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.9 sec
516 ms
Click here to check amazing Bridge Preservation content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bridgepreservation.com
Spray Applied Waterproofing for Rail, Highway and Tunnels. Bridge Preservation LLC is the Technology Leader in Bridge Deck Waterproofing and Expansion Joints.
Visit bridgepreservation.comWe analyzed Bridgepreservation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
bridgepreservation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value23.8 s
0/100
25%
Value15.4 s
0/100
10%
Value1,680 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.14
79/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
1359 ms
53 ms
53 ms
81 ms
89 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Bridgepreservation.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Farm1.staticflickr.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Bridgepreservation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (45%)
4.3 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Bridgepreservation.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bridge Preservation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 847.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 847.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 995.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bridgepreservation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 995.4 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (63%)
73
27
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridge Preservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bridgepreservation.com
1359 ms
css
53 ms
layerslider.css
53 ms
css
81 ms
advanced-responsive-video-embedder-public.css
89 ms
style.css
88 ms
font-awesome.min.css
109 ms
stylesheet.min.css
136 ms
style_dynamic.php
518 ms
responsive.min.css
113 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.php
550 ms
js_composer.min.css
205 ms
custom_css.php
530 ms
app.css
169 ms
frontend.css
173 ms
jquery.js
261 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
204 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
264 ms
greensock.js
261 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
267 ms
js
74 ms
maps.js
276 ms
badge_code_v2.gne
169 ms
qode-like.js
275 ms
plugins.js
396 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
313 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
312 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
346 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
348 ms
js
118 ms
default_dynamic.php
1063 ms
default.min.js
392 ms
custom_js.php
1056 ms
comment-reply.min.js
425 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
460 ms
wp-embed.min.js
494 ms
lib.core.js
529 ms
lib.view.js
645 ms
client.js
652 ms
client.js
655 ms
tag.item.js
656 ms
tag.ui.js
660 ms
handler.image.js
604 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
589 ms
ga.js
33 ms
bpmenu_logo.png
118 ms
bb2.jpg
423 ms
title-logo.png
119 ms
home3.jpg
191 ms
home4.jpg
419 ms
home2.jpg
420 ms
home1.jpg
421 ms
uprr-spray-applied-ballast-mat_003-570x570.jpg
423 ms
caltrans_spray-applied-ballast-mat_006-570x570.jpg
426 ms
callahan-tunnel-spray-applied-waterproofing-012-570x570.jpg
424 ms
bpmenu_logo.png
425 ms
__utm.gif
92 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
69 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
70 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
71 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
69 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
68 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
289 ms
20061699504_b2f9ea1671_s.jpg
269 ms
20497522859_409ed1f18a_s.jpg
62 ms
p
62 ms
20496277020_e65c498ff2_s.jpg
57 ms
20658001896_22eaf4b6d6_s.jpg
261 ms
20496245808_c21c027e5e_s.jpg
263 ms
20691018171_c298836dda_s.jpg
262 ms
20675036142_549d73e37e_s.jpg
233 ms
flickr.png
240 ms
20691018221_3198a2338a_s.jpg
229 ms
20497522769_8761230857_s.jpg
230 ms
logo.png
42 ms
style.css
36 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
36 ms
style.css
38 ms
bridgepreservation.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bridgepreservation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
bridgepreservation.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridgepreservation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bridgepreservation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bridgepreservation.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bridge Preservation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: