2.1 sec in total
30 ms
1.9 sec
174 ms
Click here to check amazing Bridge Preservation content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bridgepreservation.com
Spray Applied Waterproofing for Rail, Highway and Tunnels. Bridge Preservation LLC is the Technology Leader in Bridge Deck Waterproofing and Expansion Joints.
Visit bridgepreservation.comWe analyzed Bridgepreservation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
bridgepreservation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value16.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value1,320 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.14
79/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
30 ms
713 ms
19 ms
37 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 164 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (146 requests) were addressed to the original Bridgepreservation.com, 4% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (713 ms) belongs to the original domain Bridgepreservation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 118.1 kB (5%)
2.5 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Bridgepreservation.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bridge Preservation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bridgepreservation.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 142 (92%)
155
13
The browser has sent 155 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridge Preservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 117 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bridgepreservation.com
30 ms
bridgepreservation.com
713 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
19 ms
formidableforms.css
37 ms
layerslider.css
55 ms
css
57 ms
style.min.css
58 ms
main.css
49 ms
rs6.css
49 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
51 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
59 ms
style.css
60 ms
font-awesome.min.css
61 ms
style.min.css
63 ms
style.css
66 ms
dripicons.css
69 ms
kiko-all.css
71 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
74 ms
stylesheet.min.css
180 ms
print.css
79 ms
style_dynamic_callback.php
385 ms
responsive.min.css
94 ms
style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php
347 ms
js_composer.min.css
132 ms
css
51 ms
app.css
80 ms
frontend.css
91 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
103 ms
jquery.min.js
108 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
111 ms
layerslider.utils.js
156 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
157 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
156 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
158 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
167 ms
main.js
161 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
230 ms
rs6.min.js
236 ms
sharethis.js
54 ms
js
88 ms
core.min.js
228 ms
js
111 ms
js
151 ms
accordion.min.js
227 ms
menu.min.js
221 ms
dom-ready.min.js
196 ms
hooks.min.js
189 ms
i18n.min.js
189 ms
a11y.min.js
190 ms
autocomplete.min.js
190 ms
controlgroup.min.js
185 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
186 ms
button.min.js
183 ms
datepicker.min.js
183 ms
mouse.min.js
183 ms
resizable.min.js
180 ms
draggable.min.js
176 ms
dialog.min.js
178 ms
droppable.min.js
170 ms
progressbar.min.js
171 ms
selectable.min.js
169 ms
sortable.min.js
159 ms
slider.min.js
150 ms
spinner.min.js
150 ms
tooltip.min.js
145 ms
tabs.min.js
143 ms
effect.min.js
100 ms
effect-blind.min.js
100 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
106 ms
effect-clip.min.js
107 ms
effect-drop.min.js
106 ms
effect-explode.min.js
105 ms
effect-fade.min.js
105 ms
effect-fold.min.js
45 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
44 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
45 ms
effect-size.min.js
51 ms
effect-scale.min.js
51 ms
effect-shake.min.js
50 ms
effect-slide.min.js
51 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
58 ms
doubletaptogo.js
58 ms
modernizr.min.js
57 ms
jquery.appear.js
59 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
64 ms
counter.js
64 ms
easypiechart.js
63 ms
mixitup.js
69 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
71 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
71 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
71 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
87 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
77 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
78 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
78 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
84 ms
jquery.form.min.js
87 ms
waypoints.min.js
86 ms
jplayer.min.js
92 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
93 ms
skrollr.js
94 ms
Chart.min.js
124 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
93 ms
abstractBaseClass.js
92 ms
jquery.countdown.js
93 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
93 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
96 ms
bigtext.js
92 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
92 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
95 ms
typed.js
94 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
96 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
206 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
208 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
198 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
197 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
199 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
197 ms
jquery.stretch.js
191 ms
imagesloaded.js
191 ms
rangeslider.min.js
190 ms
jquery.event.move.js
185 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
182 ms
swiper.min.js
185 ms
TweenLite.min.js
181 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
173 ms
default_dynamic_callback.php
320 ms
default.min.js
176 ms
comment-reply.min.js
166 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
164 ms
qode-like.min.js
160 ms
maps.js
163 ms
wp-embed.min.js
157 ms
lib.core.js
157 ms
lib.view.js
159 ms
client.js
154 ms
client.js
147 ms
tag.item.js
148 ms
tag.ui.js
148 ms
handler.image.js
147 ms
analytics.js
132 ms
ga.js
172 ms
ppg-logo.jpg
539 ms
bpmenu_logo.png
111 ms
pixel-video.png
110 ms
Portageville-1.jpg
492 ms
title-logo.png
111 ms
uprr-spray-applied-ballast-mat_003-570x570.jpg
111 ms
Whittier-005-570x570.jpg
112 ms
Portageville-005-570x570.jpg
179 ms
bpmenu_logo.png
113 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
119 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf
425 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
431 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
430 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
430 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf
431 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
96 ms
collect
378 ms
__utm.gif
330 ms
js
79 ms
style.css
17 ms
style.css
17 ms
style.css
17 ms
bridgepreservation.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bridgepreservation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
bridgepreservation.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridgepreservation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bridgepreservation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bridgepreservation.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bridge Preservation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: