Tools & Wizards About Us
brightcanopy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

brightcanopy.com

End-User Computing (EUC) Solutions | Nutanix

Page Load Speed

937 ms in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

498 ms

Page Rendered

406 ms

brightcanopy.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Brightcanopy content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brightcanopy.com

Nutanix makes end-user computing, or EUC, fast, easy and successful no matter where you need to securely deliver and manage virtual desktops, applications, and data.

Visit brightcanopy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Brightcanopy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 904 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

brightcanopy.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,750 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.59

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

brightcanopy.com

33 ms

brightcanopy.com

13 ms

end-user-computing

31 ms

clientlib-base.lc-v1576-lc.css

27 ms

clientlib-nut-header-scripts.lc-v1576-lc.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Brightcanopy.com, 88% (23 requests) were made to Nutanix.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (163 ms) relates to the external source Nutanix.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.3 kB (28%)

Content Size

603.4 kB

After Optimization

436.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Brightcanopy.com main page is 603.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 349.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 130.7 kB

  • Original 147.3 kB
  • After minification 102.0 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.3 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 36.6 kB

  • Original 349.7 kB
  • After minification 313.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brightcanopy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 106.3 kB
  • After minification 106.3 kB
  • After compression 106.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brightcanopy. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

brightcanopy.com

brightcanopy.com

33 ms

brightcanopy.com

brightcanopy.com

13 ms

end-user-computing

end-user-computing

31 ms

clientlib-base.lc-v1576-lc.css

clientlib-base.lc-v1576-lc.css

27 ms

clientlib-nut-header-scripts.lc-v1576-lc.js

clientlib-nut-header-scripts.lc-v1576-lc.js

61 ms

launch-EN5a788821824f40949d6098b887502805.min.js

launch-EN5a788821824f40949d6098b887502805.min.js

145 ms

clientlib-layout.lc-v1576-lc.css

clientlib-layout.lc-v1576-lc.css

68 ms

clientlib-base.lc-v1576-lc.js

clientlib-base.lc-v1576-lc.js

152 ms

icn-cog.png

icn-cog.png

120 ms

icn-analytics.png

icn-analytics.png

73 ms

icn-security.png

icn-security.png

72 ms

img.png

img.png

72 ms

img.png

img.png

90 ms

img.png

img.png

86 ms

logo_citrix.png

logo_citrix.png

94 ms

logo-vmware-gray2.png

logo-vmware-gray2.png

95 ms

logo-dizzion-frame.png

logo-dizzion-frame.png

105 ms

img.png

img.png

103 ms

img.png

img.png

103 ms

img.png

img.png

162 ms

ui-product-hero-form-image.png

ui-product-hero-form-image.png

163 ms

montserrat-400.ttf

montserrat-400.ttf

109 ms

montserrat-500.ttf

montserrat-500.ttf

109 ms

montserrat-300.ttf

montserrat-300.ttf

91 ms

montserrat-700.ttf

montserrat-700.ttf

128 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

19 ms

Accessibility Review

brightcanopy.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

brightcanopy.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

brightcanopy.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brightcanopy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brightcanopy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

brightcanopy.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brightcanopy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: