Tools & Wizards About Us
brightleaf.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

brightleaf.com

AI-powered contract data extraction | Brightleaf Solutions

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

465 ms

brightleaf.com screenshot

About Website

Visit brightleaf.com now to see the best up-to-date Brightleaf content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about brightleaf.com

We are the leading provider of contract metadata extraction and analytics using its own semantic intelligence/natural language processing technology

Visit brightleaf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Brightleaf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

brightleaf.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

brightleaf.com

27 ms

brightleaf.com

30 ms

1eb8d30ae3bc.google-fonts.css

259 ms

cab855aaba60.google-fonts.css

275 ms

jquery.min.js

318 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Brightleaf.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Clarity.ms and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (860 ms) belongs to the original domain Brightleaf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 422.7 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Brightleaf.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 788.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 273.3 kB

  • Original 326.1 kB
  • After minification 320.6 kB
  • After compression 52.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 273.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 94.7 kB

  • Original 788.0 kB
  • After minification 693.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Brightleaf needs image optimization as it can save up to 94.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 53.1 kB

  • Original 419.5 kB
  • After minification 419.4 kB
  • After compression 366.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 12.3 kB
  • After minification 12.3 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brightleaf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (63%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brightleaf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

brightleaf.com

brightleaf.com

27 ms

brightleaf.com

brightleaf.com

30 ms

1eb8d30ae3bc.google-fonts.css

1eb8d30ae3bc.google-fonts.css

259 ms

cab855aaba60.google-fonts.css

cab855aaba60.google-fonts.css

275 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

318 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

263 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

264 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

273 ms

bootstrap-wp.js

bootstrap-wp.js

342 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

423 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

345 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

349 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

357 ms

jquery.velocity.js

jquery.velocity.js

520 ms

appear.config.js

appear.config.js

439 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

449 ms

main.js

main.js

428 ms

enable-sticky-header.js

enable-sticky-header.js

432 ms

custom.css

custom.css

503 ms

custom.js

custom.js

505 ms

734811513188.google-fonts.css

734811513188.google-fonts.css

516 ms

40745998caa4.google-fonts.css

40745998caa4.google-fonts.css

515 ms

7d81be55bc30.google-fonts.css

7d81be55bc30.google-fonts.css

533 ms

10f75aeee196.google-fonts.css

10f75aeee196.google-fonts.css

596 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

588 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

656 ms

index.js

index.js

657 ms

cv.js

cv.js

656 ms

cvpro.min.js

cvpro.min.js

734 ms

collapse.js

collapse.js

717 ms

rmp-menu.js

rmp-menu.js

691 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

719 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

860 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

691 ms

new-tab.js

new-tab.js

771 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

773 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

770 ms

js

js

73 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

807 ms

bvprdiim3h

bvprdiim3h

54 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

553 ms

pminstantpage.min.js

pminstantpage.min.js

605 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

596 ms

jquery.bxslider.js

jquery.bxslider.js

626 ms

Transparent-BL-Logo-e1519192210345.png

Transparent-BL-Logo-e1519192210345.png

541 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

15 ms

home012.png

home012.png

214 ms

bg-round-tec.png

bg-round-tec.png

213 ms

scroll-top.png

scroll-top.png

291 ms

bvprdiim3h

bvprdiim3h

42 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

245 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

392 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

286 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

277 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

476 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

372 ms

vc_linecons.woff

vc_linecons.woff

253 ms

comillas.jpg

comillas.jpg

234 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

97 ms

Untitled-design-67.png

Untitled-design-67.png

169 ms

bg2023_2.png

bg2023_2.png

327 ms

reso.jpg

reso.jpg

206 ms

partner.jpg

partner.jpg

253 ms

4.png

4.png

300 ms

iso-e1682514183897.png

iso-e1682514183897.png

293 ms

gdpr-e1682514077190.png

gdpr-e1682514077190.png

315 ms

hippa-removebg-preview-removebg-preview-1.png

hippa-removebg-preview-removebg-preview-1.png

336 ms

Alorica_New.png

Alorica_New.png

385 ms

BT_NEW.jpg

BT_NEW.jpg

386 ms

AppNexus_New.jpg

AppNexus_New.jpg

403 ms

Webp.net-resizeimage-10.png

Webp.net-resizeimage-10.png

405 ms

BNSF_New.png

BNSF_New.png

410 ms

Cipla_New.jpg

Cipla_New.jpg

418 ms

gettyimages_new.png

gettyimages_new.png

386 ms

neilsen_new.png

neilsen_new.png

473 ms

c.gif

c.gif

8 ms

Accessibility Review

brightleaf.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

brightleaf.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

brightleaf.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brightleaf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brightleaf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

brightleaf.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brightleaf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: