Tools & Wizards About Us
bristolhcs.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

bristolhcs.com

Revenue Cycle Management Company | Bristol Healthcare

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

207 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

bristolhcs.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bristolhcs.com homepage info - get ready to check Bristol Hcs best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bristolhcs.com

We are a technology-driven billing, coding, and accounts receivable solutions provider helping transform revenue cycle experiences for healthcare entities.

Visit bristolhcs.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bristolhcs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bristolhcs.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.632

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bristolhcs.com

207 ms

www.bristolhcs.com

178 ms

www.bristolhcs.com

342 ms

gtm.js

61 ms

js

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Bristolhcs.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Code.tidio.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (588 ms) belongs to the original domain Bristolhcs.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 172.3 kB (19%)

Content Size

891.7 kB

After Optimization

719.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bristolhcs.com main page is 891.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 342.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 139.0 kB

  • Original 155.5 kB
  • After minification 78.6 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 76.8 kB, which is 49% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 342.1 kB
  • After minification 337.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bristol Hcs images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 278.9 kB
  • After minification 278.9 kB
  • After compression 265.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 115.2 kB
  • After minification 115.2 kB
  • After compression 100.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bristolhcs.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (42%)

Requests Now

103

After Optimization

60

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bristol Hcs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bristolhcs.com

bristolhcs.com

207 ms

www.bristolhcs.com

www.bristolhcs.com

178 ms

www.bristolhcs.com

www.bristolhcs.com

342 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

61 ms

js

js

98 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

120 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

181 ms

feather.css

feather.css

192 ms

font.css

font.css

196 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

193 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

196 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

194 ms

jquery.scrollbar.css

jquery.scrollbar.css

242 ms

dropzone.css

dropzone.css

250 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

253 ms

flaticon.min.css

flaticon.min.css

252 ms

lc_lightbox.css

lc_lightbox.css

254 ms

bootstrap-slider.min.css

bootstrap-slider.min.css

256 ms

bootstrap4-toggle.min.css

bootstrap4-toggle.min.css

298 ms

dataTables.bootstrap4.min.css

dataTables.bootstrap4.min.css

307 ms

date-picker.css

date-picker.css

307 ms

fullcalendar.min.css

fullcalendar.min.css

310 ms

style.css

style.css

382 ms

nsv1aj3ewdfirgrazjrfyy56orqlbvhx.js

nsv1aj3ewdfirgrazjrfyy56orqlbvhx.js

152 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

321 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

309 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

584 ms

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.js

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.js

318 ms

bootstrap-slider.min.js

bootstrap-slider.min.js

318 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

369 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

582 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

584 ms

waypoints-sticky.min.js

waypoints-sticky.min.js

583 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

585 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

584 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

585 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

586 ms

jquery.scrollbar.min.js

jquery.scrollbar.min.js

586 ms

dropzone.js

dropzone.js

586 ms

bootstrap4-toggle.min.js

bootstrap4-toggle.min.js

586 ms

jquery.dataTables.min.js

jquery.dataTables.min.js

588 ms

dataTables.bootstrap4.min.js

dataTables.bootstrap4.min.js

586 ms

lc_lightbox.lite.js

lc_lightbox.lite.js

523 ms

render.b16d95a5aac4cf92625a.js

render.b16d95a5aac4cf92625a.js

41 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

464 ms

fullcalendar.min.js

fullcalendar.min.js

505 ms

recaptcha-api.js

recaptcha-api.js

454 ms

custom.js

custom.js

453 ms

css2

css2

38 ms

logo-light.webp

logo-light.webp

175 ms

logo-dark.webp

logo-dark.webp

176 ms

doctor.webp

doctor.webp

179 ms

icon1.webp

icon1.webp

220 ms

icon2.webp

icon2.webp

257 ms

icon3.webp

icon3.webp

256 ms

icon4.webp

icon4.webp

257 ms

pic1.webp

pic1.webp

256 ms

pic2.webp

pic2.webp

269 ms

pic3.jpg

pic3.jpg

358 ms

pic4.webp

pic4.webp

355 ms

1.webp

1.webp

358 ms

2.webp

2.webp

354 ms

3.webp

3.webp

356 ms

4.webp

4.webp

359 ms

orthopedics.webp

orthopedics.webp

361 ms

cardiology.webp

cardiology.webp

359 ms

physical-therapy.webp

physical-therapy.webp

362 ms

surgery.webp

surgery.webp

199 ms

anesthesiology.webp

anesthesiology.webp

201 ms

1.webp

1.webp

211 ms

2.webp

2.webp

241 ms

3.webp

3.webp

238 ms

406.webp

406.webp

237 ms

407.webp

407.webp

241 ms

408.webp

408.webp

239 ms

409.webp

409.webp

263 ms

410.webp

410.webp

295 ms

411.webp

411.webp

297 ms

412.webp

412.webp

295 ms

413.webp

413.webp

298 ms

414.webp

414.webp

298 ms

415.webp

415.webp

317 ms

416.webp

416.webp

349 ms

417.webp

417.webp

350 ms

apma.webp

apma.webp

352 ms

cpma.webp

cpma.webp

375 ms

font

font

88 ms

Feather.ttf

Feather.ttf

355 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

390 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

387 ms

large-pic.webp

large-pic.webp

327 ms

5.webp

5.webp

327 ms

6.webp

6.webp

331 ms

7.webp

7.webp

339 ms

left-lines.png

left-lines.png

332 ms

img31.webp

img31.webp

286 ms

img1.webp

img1.webp

286 ms

img21.webp

img21.webp

290 ms

right-lines.png

right-lines.png

297 ms

r-img31.webp

r-img31.webp

299 ms

ri-img1.webp

ri-img1.webp

308 ms

r-img21.webp

r-img21.webp

341 ms

345 ms

17151450031b1.webp

17151450031b1.webp

404 ms

1715085724184909175_m-768x512.webp

1715085724184909175_m-768x512.webp

354 ms

icon1.png

icon1.png

353 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

356 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

385 ms

icon2.png

icon2.png

364 ms

large-pic1.jpg

large-pic1.jpg

437 ms

Accessibility Review

bristolhcs.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bristolhcs.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bristolhcs.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8;

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bristolhcs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bristolhcs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8;. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

bristolhcs.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bristol Hcs. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: