Tools & Wizards About Us
britecheck.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

britecheck.com

Discover the Top Inventory Management App for Small Businesses

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

998 ms

Page Rendered

439 ms

britecheck.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Britecheck content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about britecheck.com

Streamline Your Inventory with the Best Simple Management App for Small Businesses - Get Organized Today

Visit britecheck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Britecheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

britecheck.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

britecheck.com

42 ms

10-huge-benefits-of-construction-inventory-management-software.kTLZS52J.css

22 ms

js

88 ms

jquery-3.6.1.min.js

39 ms

bootstrap.min.js

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Britecheck.com, 24% (15 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (567 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.1 kB (62%)

Content Size

33.9 kB

After Optimization

12.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Britecheck.com main page is 33.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 27.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

  • Original 27.2 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 234 B

  • Original 6.7 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (42%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Britecheck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

britecheck.com

britecheck.com

42 ms

10-huge-benefits-of-construction-inventory-management-software.kTLZS52J.css

10-huge-benefits-of-construction-inventory-management-software.kTLZS52J.css

22 ms

js

js

88 ms

jquery-3.6.1.min.js

jquery-3.6.1.min.js

39 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

34 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

79 ms

jquery.wow.min.js

jquery.wow.min.js

41 ms

logo-britecheck.LLomc-Mn_1oPGbl.svg

logo-britecheck.LLomc-Mn_1oPGbl.svg

33 ms

iba-scan-new.BqEphW_9_1tU6fD.webp

iba-scan-new.BqEphW_9_1tU6fD.webp

83 ms

video-play-icon.twjwBNdj_Z2ljQ0U.webp

video-play-icon.twjwBNdj_Z2ljQ0U.webp

89 ms

brite-1.goa1t-h5_Z9S7Xy.webp

brite-1.goa1t-h5_Z9S7Xy.webp

88 ms

brite-2.xyvCuIkr_W24mV.webp

brite-2.xyvCuIkr_W24mV.webp

89 ms

inventory.RdpqQtml_Z167Ds2.webp

inventory.RdpqQtml_Z167Ds2.webp

89 ms

team.nDjWnlbW_lPcN6.webp

team.nDjWnlbW_lPcN6.webp

90 ms

24-hours.spyfy3MP_Z1auWEE.webp

24-hours.spyfy3MP_Z1auWEE.webp

91 ms

brite-3.kUCRXQxA_2nLSvf.webp

brite-3.kUCRXQxA_2nLSvf.webp

120 ms

hawaii.rhAXgOZY_57AhW.webp

hawaii.rhAXgOZY_57AhW.webp

120 ms

navy_logo.WnlvoCPa_FIIS9.webp

navy_logo.WnlvoCPa_FIIS9.webp

120 ms

seal_of_minnesota_logo.oYwf_jDF_MDV19.webp

seal_of_minnesota_logo.oYwf_jDF_MDV19.webp

120 ms

tahn-logo.X8pOHzKm_1iKypo.webp

tahn-logo.X8pOHzKm_1iKypo.webp

119 ms

ucla2.Egs_gLG3_2rfcLn.webp

ucla2.Egs_gLG3_2rfcLn.webp

118 ms

emory._cz1djnP_Z1pOMrC.webp

emory._cz1djnP_Z1pOMrC.webp

132 ms

us_state_department.UIGrBGAl_ZJmwNA.webp

us_state_department.UIGrBGAl_ZJmwNA.webp

132 ms

sega.GhgvbB8J_iYmEY.webp

sega.GhgvbB8J_iYmEY.webp

131 ms

unilever_logo.eg11Hyty_ZGfJvR.webp

unilever_logo.eg11Hyty_ZGfJvR.webp

131 ms

whole_foods_logo.uM1AESY0_kWT0t.webp

whole_foods_logo.uM1AESY0_kWT0t.webp

132 ms

NYC_DOE.IQtojjgm_Z1a2YDc.webp

NYC_DOE.IQtojjgm_Z1a2YDc.webp

131 ms

MinnesotaStateSystems.CUfFeF8A_ZzqNVM.webp

MinnesotaStateSystems.CUfFeF8A_ZzqNVM.webp

154 ms

tesla.sdHTktlE_Z2eCDc1.webp

tesla.sdHTktlE_Z2eCDc1.webp

153 ms

apple-btn.UXCzPcRg_ZDzE2h.webp

apple-btn.UXCzPcRg_ZDzE2h.webp

155 ms

google-btn.TtF8Su1a_1qHWAG.webp

google-btn.TtF8Su1a_1qHWAG.webp

152 ms

css2

css2

23 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

305 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

64 ms

font

font

567 ms

font

font

12 ms

7NH6QFEDSFFXVLMZZIVVA3

7NH6QFEDSFFXVLMZZIVVA3

13 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

26 ms

out

out

12 ms

sendrolling.js

sendrolling.js

11 ms

KNEAUDJULZHGDNWP36GSFI

KNEAUDJULZHGDNWP36GSFI

9 ms

out

out

10 ms

out

out

11 ms

out

out

42 ms

out

out

10 ms

out

out

11 ms

out

out

38 ms

out

out

39 ms

out

out

38 ms

out

out

39 ms

out

out

40 ms

out

out

41 ms

pixel

pixel

55 ms

tap.php

tap.php

45 ms

Pug

Pug

50 ms

pixel

pixel

29 ms

rum

rum

21 ms

sd

sd

29 ms

xuid

xuid

5 ms

in

in

4 ms

sync

sync

19 ms

bounce

bounce

20 ms

Accessibility Review

britecheck.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

britecheck.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

britecheck.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Britecheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Britecheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

britecheck.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Britecheck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: