Tools & Wizards About Us
britefish.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

britefish.net

Britefish Marketing, Web Design & Development in Chicago, IL

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

157 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

313 ms

britefish.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Britefish content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about britefish.net

Britefish is the Marketing & Web Services division of Realnets. Chicago marketing agency offering SEO, PPC, Social Media, Design, App Development, & more.

Visit britefish.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Britefish.net page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

britefish.net performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value43.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,040 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.772

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value38.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.britefish.net

157 ms

style.min.css

27 ms

styles.css

49 ms

full-styles.6.12.0.css

83 ms

mkhb-render.css

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Britefish.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (329 ms) belongs to the original domain Britefish.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 171.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

948.3 kB

After Optimization

776.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Britefish.net main page is 948.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 414.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 167.1 kB

  • Original 192.5 kB
  • After minification 186.0 kB
  • After compression 25.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 167.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 341 B

  • Original 186.2 kB
  • After minification 185.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Britefish images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 414.5 kB
  • After minification 414.5 kB
  • After compression 411.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 155.2 kB
  • After minification 154.9 kB
  • After compression 153.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Britefish.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (78%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Britefish. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.britefish.net

www.britefish.net

157 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

27 ms

styles.css

styles.css

49 ms

full-styles.6.12.0.css

full-styles.6.12.0.css

83 ms

mkhb-render.css

mkhb-render.css

68 ms

mkhb-row.css

mkhb-row.css

70 ms

mkhb-column.css

mkhb-column.css

68 ms

theme-options-production-1709829537.css

theme-options-production-1709829537.css

70 ms

shortcodes-styles.min.css

shortcodes-styles.min.css

105 ms

style.css

style.css

89 ms

webfontloader.js

webfontloader.js

89 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

132 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

92 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

132 ms

index.js

index.js

129 ms

index.js

index.js

130 ms

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

130 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

131 ms

full-scripts.6.12.0.js

full-scripts.6.12.0.js

329 ms

mkhb-render.js

mkhb-render.js

180 ms

mkhb-column.js

mkhb-column.js

181 ms

shortcodes-scripts.min.js

shortcodes-scripts.min.js

184 ms

api.js

api.js

73 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

184 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

183 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

183 ms

index.js

index.js

183 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

329 ms

css

css

66 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

193 ms

logo-2018-britefish-division-2.png

logo-2018-britefish-division-2.png

152 ms

logo-mobile-britefish-2017.png

logo-mobile-britefish-2017.png

152 ms

startup-594091.jpg

startup-594091.jpg

167 ms

logo-2018-britefish-division-640px.png

logo-2018-britefish-division-640px.png

151 ms

logo-britefish-and-realnets-2.png

logo-britefish-and-realnets-2.png

150 ms

dummy-transparent-qkvb01owaang48ieug2arx2r6unnfrt51rylldnvzg.png

dummy-transparent-qkvb01owaang48ieug2arx2r6unnfrt51rylldnvzg.png

151 ms

font

font

141 ms

font

font

141 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

67 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

78 ms

Accessibility Review

britefish.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

britefish.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

britefish.net SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Britefish.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Britefish.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

britefish.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Britefish. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: