4.4 sec in total
640 ms
3.6 sec
173 ms
Visit british-gypsum.com now to see the best up-to-date British Gypsum content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about british-gypsum.com
With over 100 years' experience in plaster, plasterboard and ceiling solutions, we create innovative product which deliver meaningful customer benefits.
Visit british-gypsum.comWe analyzed British-gypsum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 640 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
british-gypsum.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value1,390 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
640 ms
915 ms
158 ms
160 ms
238 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original British-gypsum.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain British-gypsum.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (50%)
2.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of British-gypsum.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 324.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, British Gypsum needs image optimization as it can save up to 324.1 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 433.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 433.8 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 201.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. British-gypsum.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (43%)
60
34
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of British Gypsum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
british-gypsum.com
640 ms
www.british-gypsum.com
915 ms
VisitorIdentification.js
158 ms
reset.css
160 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.19.custom.css
238 ms
cssToolKit.css
160 ms
styles.css
399 ms
modernizr.custom.js
235 ms
jquery.min.js
67 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
86 ms
jquery.dotdotdot-1.5.1.js
235 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
395 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
394 ms
jquery.fusion.nested-menus.js
317 ms
BG-Custom.js
415 ms
jquery.checkbox.min.js
388 ms
remotebasket.js
332 ms
CommonCookieLaw.js
396 ms
js
53 ms
WebResource.axd
242 ms
WebResource.axd
325 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
jquery.checkbox.css
80 ms
analytics.js
42 ms
siteanalyze_6009292.js
210 ms
webengage-min-v-4.0.js
41 ms
q.gif
89 ms
BritishGypsumLogo.gif
187 ms
Team-main-image-2.jpg
1220 ms
Technical-Academy-Locations.jpg
693 ms
FAQ.JPG
1139 ms
SpecSure.png
1689 ms
Cover-Product-Data-Sheet-Gyproc-WallBoard.jpg
189 ms
Cover-WHITE-BOOK-WEB.jpg
283 ms
searchSubmit.png
271 ms
Banner-Gyproc-Habito.jpg
394 ms
web-banner.jpg
480 ms
Banner-Thistle-UniFinish.jpg
493 ms
Banner-ACTIVair2.jpg
598 ms
Product-Selector.jpg
600 ms
White-Book-System-Selector.jpg
688 ms
White-Book.jpg
706 ms
U-Value-Calculator.jpg
802 ms
Training.jpg
888 ms
Contact-Us.jpg
821 ms
Cheetham%20Hill.JPG
920 ms
Wages.JPG
925 ms
Second%20sobell2.jpg
999 ms
Thistle_Magnetic_Plaster.jpg
1037 ms
Thistle-UniFinish.jpg
1025 ms
PrevNext.png
1079 ms
SaintGobain-Mini.png
1091 ms
collect
86 ms
RemoteBasketProxy
1009 ms
300lo.json
40 ms
close.png
990 ms
ActiveArrow.png
1005 ms
collect
81 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
37 ms
storage-frame-1.10.htm
67 ms
image.aspx
85 ms
v4.js
24 ms
gz.js
12 ms
v4.js
7 ms
print.css
81 ms
nr-852.min.js
16 ms
british-gypsum.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
british-gypsum.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
british-gypsum.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise British-gypsum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that British-gypsum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
british-gypsum.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of British Gypsum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: