Access brocktonsmith.com. k8凯发(中国)天生赢家·一触即发

brocktonsmith.com screenshot

0

Performance
54

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 23% of websites
75

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
35% of websites
92

SEO

Google-friendlier than
74% of websites

First Response

832 ms

Resources Loaded

10.1 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

brocktonsmith.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to brocktonsmith.com homepage info - get ready to check Brocktonsmith best content right away, or after learning these important things about brocktonsmith.com

凯发k8国际网站,凯发k8国际首页登录网址,k8凯发国际官方入口,天生赢家凯发k8国际【2024欧洲杯注册就送/首存再送】,提供真人,体育;电子;彩票;棋牌等娱乐服务,支付秒到账,客服24小时在线,让您畅快游戏!!

Visit brocktonsmith.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Brocktonsmith.com page load time and found that the first response time was 832 ms and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,080 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

brocktonsmith.com

832 ms

www.brocktonsmith.com

894 ms

hh.css

65 ms

tj.js

128 ms

gg.js

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 206 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (165 requests) were addressed to the original Brocktonsmith.com, 15% (31 requests) were made to 91a2c0front.alkacdb.cn and 1% (2 requests) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Collect-v6.51.la.

Content Size

107.8 kB

After Optimization

73.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Brocktonsmith.com main page is 107.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 55.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 33.6 kB

Original 38.6 kB
After minification 29.6 kB
After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.0 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 541 B

Original 13.9 kB
After minification 13.9 kB
After compression 13.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 100 B

Original 55.3 kB
After minification 55.3 kB
After compression 55.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brocktonsmith.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brocktonsmith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

robots.txt is not valid

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brocktonsmith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Brocktonsmith.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

brocktonsmith.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Brocktonsmith. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: