Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

Page Load Speed

293 ms in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

122 ms

Page Rendered

53 ms

broebelair.be screenshot

About Website

Visit broebelair.be now to see the best up-to-date Broebelair content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about broebelair.be

Visit broebelair.be

Key Findings

We analyzed Broebelair.be page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 175 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

broebelair.be performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

broebelair.be

118 ms

bLawJloED.js

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Broebelair.be and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (118 ms) belongs to the original domain Broebelair.be.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 344 B (22%)

Content Size

1.5 kB

After Optimization

1.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Broebelair.be main page is 1.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 284 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 759 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 284 B or 27% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 265 B
  • After minification 264 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Broebelair images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 59 B

  • Original 231 B
  • After minification 202 B
  • After compression 172 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59 B or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Broebelair. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

broebelair.be accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

broebelair.be best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

broebelair.be SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Broebelair.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Broebelair.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Broebelair. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: