5.8 sec in total
654 ms
4.8 sec
331 ms
Visit btiscan.com now to see the best up-to-date Btiscan content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about btiscan.com
Visit btiscan.comWe analyzed Btiscan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 654 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
btiscan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.095
91/100
15%
Value13.0 s
12/100
10%
654 ms
223 ms
235 ms
256 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Btiscan.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Btiscan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 329.6 kB (22%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Btiscan.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 653.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Btiscan needs image optimization as it can save up to 118.8 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 125.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.3 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Btiscan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (80%)
54
11
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Btiscan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
btiscan.com
654 ms
bootstrap.min.css
223 ms
font-awesome.min.css
235 ms
style.css
256 ms
css
96 ms
js
196 ms
js
117 ms
style.min.css
292 ms
styles.css
521 ms
style.css
297 ms
js_composer.min.css
442 ms
twentytwenty.css
469 ms
bafg-style.css
470 ms
frontend-gtag.js
504 ms
jquery.min.js
499 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
534 ms
navigation.js
642 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
650 ms
bootstrap.min.js
707 ms
jquery.event.move.js
716 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
582 ms
js
148 ms
email-decode.min.js
536 ms
player.js
93 ms
rs6.css
788 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
824 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
892 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
894 ms
hooks.min.js
923 ms
i18n.min.js
922 ms
index.js
984 ms
index.js
1035 ms
rbtools.min.js
1060 ms
rs6.min.js
1098 ms
js
143 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1153 ms
masonry.min.js
1200 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
1192 ms
frontend.js
1239 ms
infobox.min.js
1275 ms
maps.js
1328 ms
bafg-custom-js.js
1374 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1400 ms
jquery.matchHeight.js
1410 ms
fbevents.js
105 ms
859071252
284 ms
logo.png
722 ms
Screenshot-2022-12-07-at-5.41.01-PM.png
766 ms
woman-thermo2.jpg
694 ms
housing-black-back-scaled.jpg
917 ms
facebook.png
887 ms
twitter.png
898 ms
google_plus.png
950 ms
linkedin.png
972 ms
youtube.png
1089 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
115 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
115 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
116 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1049 ms
api.js
36 ms
btiscan.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
btiscan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
btiscan.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Btiscan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Btiscan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
btiscan.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Btiscan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: