7.3 sec in total
491 ms
6.5 sec
317 ms
Visit btw.nz now to see the best up-to-date BTW content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about btw.nz
BTW Company is a multidisciplinary one-stop consultancy with unparalleled experience on national and international projects.
Visit btw.nzWe analyzed Btw.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 491 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
btw.nz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
491 ms
1034 ms
198 ms
398 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Btw.nz, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Btw.nz.
Page size can be reduced by 180.1 kB (25%)
722.9 kB
542.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Btw.nz main page is 722.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 297.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 125.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. BTW images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 49.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Btw.nz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (95%)
77
4
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BTW. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
btw.nz
491 ms
www.btw.nz
1034 ms
custom-frontend-legacy.min.css
198 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
398 ms
css
33 ms
general.min.css
594 ms
eael-22.css
602 ms
style.min.css
833 ms
ae-pro.min.css
610 ms
team.min.css
822 ms
slick.css
615 ms
magnific-popup.css
789 ms
wp-pap-public.min.css
797 ms
job-listings.css
828 ms
vegas.min.css
829 ms
style.min.css
994 ms
theme.min.css
1024 ms
header-footer.min.css
1027 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1028 ms
swiper.min.css
1030 ms
post-1691.css
1178 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
1399 ms
all.min.css
1227 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1234 ms
global.css
1238 ms
post-7.css
1235 ms
post-22.css
1380 ms
style.min.css
1430 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1433 ms
post-35.css
1435 ms
post-48.css
1437 ms
style.css
1574 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1599 ms
solid.min.css
1632 ms
brands.min.css
1634 ms
theme.css
1635 ms
jquery.min.js
1843 ms
eael-146.css
1767 ms
post-146.css
1610 ms
post-169.css
1443 ms
post-87.css
1254 ms
post-165.css
1246 ms
animations.min.css
1468 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1467 ms
theme.js
1418 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1405 ms
general.min.js
1379 ms
eael-22.js
1376 ms
ae-pro.min.js
1400 ms
index.min.js
1425 ms
ae-editor.min.js
1428 ms
team.min.js
1421 ms
vegas.min.js
1388 ms
happy-addons.min.js
1386 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
1393 ms
eael-146.js
1402 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1438 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1390 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1380 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1377 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1373 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1249 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1612 ms
hooks.min.js
1390 ms
i18n.min.js
1380 ms
frontend.min.js
1389 ms
waypoints.min.js
1390 ms
core.min.js
1253 ms
swiper.min.js
1421 ms
share-link.min.js
1393 ms
dialog.min.js
1443 ms
frontend.min.js
1426 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
1309 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1437 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1388 ms
gtm.js
234 ms
btw-logo.svg
1346 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
164 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
166 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
269 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
269 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
290 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
290 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
287 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
288 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
288 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1709 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1326 ms
btw.ttf
1140 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1504 ms
js
81 ms
BTW_50yearSymbol_finalforwebsite.png
1021 ms
btw.nz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
btw.nz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
btw.nz SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Btw.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Btw.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
btw.nz
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of BTW. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: