Tools & Wizards About Us
buckinghamclinic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

buckinghamclinic.com

Physiotherapy - Osteopathy | Buckingham Clinic - Glasgow

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

177 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

339 ms

buckinghamclinic.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Buckingham Clinic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about buckinghamclinic.com

Leading physiotherapists & osteopaths based in Glasgow. Treat prolonged back & neck pain, slipped & prolapsed discs. Find out more now.

Visit buckinghamclinic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Buckinghamclinic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

buckinghamclinic.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.086

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

buckinghamclinic.com

177 ms

www.buckinghamclinic.com

426 ms

font-awesome.min.css

148 ms

reset.css

222 ms

foundation.css

297 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Buckinghamclinic.com, 22% (11 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (496 ms) belongs to the original domain Buckinghamclinic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 256.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Buckinghamclinic.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 30.5 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Buckingham Clinic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 140.0 kB

  • Original 214.9 kB
  • After minification 202.6 kB
  • After compression 74.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 77.3 kB

  • Original 116.2 kB
  • After minification 97.8 kB
  • After compression 38.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buckinghamclinic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (57%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buckingham Clinic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

buckinghamclinic.com

buckinghamclinic.com

177 ms

www.buckinghamclinic.com

www.buckinghamclinic.com

426 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

148 ms

reset.css

reset.css

222 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

297 ms

slider.css

slider.css

305 ms

style.css

style.css

381 ms

menu.css

menu.css

306 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

308 ms

fqu1jwj.js

fqu1jwj.js

72 ms

widgetAjax.min.js

widgetAjax.min.js

18 ms

jquery-2.1.1.js

jquery-2.1.1.js

390 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

388 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

309 ms

slider.js

slider.js

310 ms

classie.js

classie.js

387 ms

menu-fade.js

menu-fade.js

387 ms

idd-reversed.svg

idd-reversed.svg

201 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

201 ms

002.jpg

002.jpg

346 ms

003.jpg

003.jpg

343 ms

idd.png

idd.png

202 ms

clinic-garden-web-safe.jpg

clinic-garden-web-safe.jpg

355 ms

lunge-web-safe.jpg

lunge-web-safe.jpg

496 ms

intro.jpg

intro.jpg

349 ms

treatment2.jpg

treatment2.jpg

349 ms

patients.jpg

patients.jpg

421 ms

idd.png

idd.png

421 ms

d

d

149 ms

d

d

146 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

446 ms

d

d

168 ms

d

d

168 ms

true

true

228 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

180 ms

d

d

25 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

22 ms

p.gif

p.gif

25 ms

settings

settings

70 ms

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

3 ms

BuckinghamClinc

BuckinghamClinc

176 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

4 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

6 ms

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

5 ms

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

27 ms

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

26 ms

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

27 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

54 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

53 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

62 ms

Accessibility Review

buckinghamclinic.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

buckinghamclinic.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

buckinghamclinic.com SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buckinghamclinic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buckinghamclinic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

buckinghamclinic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Buckingham Clinic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: