Tools & Wizards About Us
budgetstoragecentre.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

budgetstoragecentre.com

Self Storage in North America | USA & Canada | Mini Mall Storage

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

959 ms

Page Rendered

378 ms

budgetstoragecentre.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to budgetstoragecentre.com homepage info - get ready to check Budget Storage Centre best content right away, or after learning these important things about budgetstoragecentre.com

If you’re looking for a perfect renting experience, don’t look any further! Mini Mall Storage Properties offers everything you need during your next move.

Visit budgetstoragecentre.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Budgetstoragecentre.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

budgetstoragecentre.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,010 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

budgetstoragecentre.com

32 ms

www.minimallstorage.com

294 ms

gtm.js

70 ms

style.min.css

90 ms

blocks.style.build.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Budgetstoragecentre.com, 62% (33 requests) were made to Cdn.minimallstorage.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Minimallstorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (294 ms) relates to the external source Minimallstorage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 178.5 kB (64%)

Content Size

279.9 kB

After Optimization

101.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Budgetstoragecentre.com main page is 279.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 208.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 176.7 kB

  • Original 208.8 kB
  • After minification 179.9 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 176.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Budget Storage Centre needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 13 B

  • Original 67.1 kB
  • After minification 67.1 kB
  • After compression 67.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (87%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Budget Storage Centre. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

budgetstoragecentre.com

budgetstoragecentre.com

32 ms

www.minimallstorage.com

www.minimallstorage.com

294 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

70 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

90 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

34 ms

storage-essentials-public.css

storage-essentials-public.css

37 ms

public.css

public.css

38 ms

app.min.css

app.min.css

153 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

44 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

47 ms

maps-callback.js

maps-callback.js

46 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

46 ms

chat-script.js

chat-script.js

46 ms

jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js

jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js

45 ms

js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js

js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js

52 ms

public.js

public.js

51 ms

herobanner.css

herobanner.css

51 ms

ttm1ity.css

ttm1ity.css

51 ms

118022.js

118022.js

58 ms

phosphor-icons

phosphor-icons

43 ms

11460.js

11460.js

48 ms

app.js

app.js

48 ms

118022.js

118022.js

54 ms

67e0705c59.js

67e0705c59.js

48 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

52 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

53 ms

phosphor-icons@1.4.2

phosphor-icons@1.4.2

46 ms

index.js

index.js

15 ms

css

css

29 ms

p.css

p.css

23 ms

MMSP-2022-Orange.Logo-Horizontal-en.webp

MMSP-2022-Orange.Logo-Horizontal-en.webp

72 ms

email-icon.png

email-icon.png

55 ms

MMSP-24-1stMonthFree-HomePageHeroImages-JL-v1-DESKTOP-1900x570.webp

MMSP-24-1stMonthFree-HomePageHeroImages-JL-v1-DESKTOP-1900x570.webp

57 ms

Magnifying.webp

Magnifying.webp

56 ms

pencil.webp

pencil.webp

292 ms

close-box.webp

close-box.webp

56 ms

lock.webp

lock.webp

56 ms

711a4eb654bf1139f123.otf

711a4eb654bf1139f123.otf

73 ms

94f2f163d4b698242fef.otf

94f2f163d4b698242fef.otf

68 ms

icons.css

icons.css

57 ms

d

d

147 ms

d

d

223 ms

mock-background-mobile4.webp

mock-background-mobile4.webp

6 ms

5x5.webp

5x5.webp

4 ms

5x10.webp

5x10.webp

5 ms

10x10.webp

10x10.webp

8 ms

10x20.webp

10x20.webp

14 ms

no-sweat-storage.webp

no-sweat-storage.webp

20 ms

we-hear-you.webp

we-hear-you.webp

12 ms

always-on-guard.webp

always-on-guard.webp

14 ms

MMSP-footer-logo-en.png

MMSP-footer-logo-en.png

13 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

56 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

budgetstoragecentre.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

budgetstoragecentre.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

budgetstoragecentre.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Budgetstoragecentre.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Budgetstoragecentre.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

budgetstoragecentre.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: