Access buffard.eu. Buffard Logistique | Un site utilisant WordPress

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

buffard.eu

271 ms

buffard.eu

2692 ms

styles.css

176 ms

style.css

230 ms

style.css

263 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Buffard.eu, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Buffard.eu.

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Buffard.eu main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 848.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 122.8 kB

Original 143.5 kB
After minification 126.2 kB
After compression 20.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 51.3 kB

Original 848.1 kB
After minification 796.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Buffard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

Original 159.5 kB
After minification 159.5 kB
After compression 158.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

Original 188.9 kB
After minification 188.0 kB
After compression 177.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buffard.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buffard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

FR
Language Claimed

FR
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buffard.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buffard.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

buffard.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Buffard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Buffard Logistique | Un site utilisant WordPress

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

buffard.eu

buffard.eu

styles.css

style.css

style.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

buffard.eu

buffard.eu

styles.css

style.css

style.css

css

bootstrap.css

font-awesome.min.css

theme.css

owl.carousel.css

perfect-scrollbar.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

quadmenu-normalize.css

quadmenu-widgets.css

style.css

quadmenu-locations.css

dashicons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

swiper.min.css

post-10.css

transx_plugin.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

ion.rangeSlider.min.css

global.css

post-1353.css

css

fontawesome.min.css

solid.min.css

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

index.js

index.js

theme.js

owl.carousel.min.js

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

index.js

slick.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

content-slider-widget.js

jquery-numerator.min.js