Tools & Wizards About Us
buffercode.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

buffercode.in

Buffercode - Leader in Digital Services and Consulting - Buffercode

Page Load Speed

11.3 sec in total

First Response

459 ms

Resources Loaded

10.3 sec

Page Rendered

525 ms

buffercode.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Buffercode content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about buffercode.in

Latest Technology News and Daily Updates on BufferCode. Get trending tech news, mobile phones, laptops, reviews, software updates, video games, internet and other technology updates on gadgets from In...

Visit buffercode.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Buffercode.in page load time and found that the first response time was 459 ms and then it took 10.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

buffercode.in performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

buffercode.in

459 ms

buffercode.in

2043 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

761 ms

style.min.css

772 ms

styles.css

852 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Buffercode.in, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Buffercode.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 222.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Buffercode.in main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 197.3 kB

  • Original 227.6 kB
  • After minification 223.5 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 554 B

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Buffercode images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 552.0 kB
  • After minification 552.0 kB
  • After compression 549.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 22.4 kB

  • Original 147.0 kB
  • After minification 147.0 kB
  • After compression 124.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buffercode.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (71%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buffercode. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

buffercode.in

buffercode.in

459 ms

buffercode.in

buffercode.in

2043 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

761 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

772 ms

styles.css

styles.css

852 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

842 ms

style.css

style.css

849 ms

css

css

42 ms

td-multipurpose.css

td-multipurpose.css

846 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1592 ms

style.css

style.css

1613 ms

td_legacy_main.css

td_legacy_main.css

1674 ms

td_standard_pack_main.css

td_standard_pack_main.css

1722 ms

demo_style.css

demo_style.css

1670 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1046 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1870 ms

revolution.tools.min.js

revolution.tools.min.js

2424 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

2369 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

25 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

1677 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

3405 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2479 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

3406 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

3407 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

3407 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

3407 ms

index.js

index.js

3407 ms

blankshield.min.js

blankshield.min.js

3406 ms

block-tabnapping.min.js

block-tabnapping.min.js

3408 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

3663 ms

js_posts_autoload.min.js

js_posts_autoload.min.js

3663 ms

tagdiv_theme.min.js

tagdiv_theme.min.js

4008 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

4020 ms

api.js

api.js

46 ms

index.js

index.js

4058 ms

js_files_for_front.min.js

js_files_for_front.min.js

4129 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

4290 ms

headerlogo1.png

headerlogo1.png

1895 ms

20180424da1d8d2f-dcd1-5007-964b-6106dc822442-1.jpg

20180424da1d8d2f-dcd1-5007-964b-6106dc822442-1.jpg

2373 ms

201804248ebe2583-c8c0-0878-64b4-5c9f505489b3-1.jpg

201804248ebe2583-c8c0-0878-64b4-5c9f505489b3-1.jpg

2377 ms

cortex.png

cortex.png

2413 ms

hex-rays-logo-quadri.png

hex-rays-logo-quadri.png

2479 ms

pan-strata-logo-2.png

pan-strata-logo-2.png

2033 ms

carbonBlack.png

carbonBlack.png

2655 ms

1280px-PaloAltoNetworks_2020_Logo.png

1280px-PaloAltoNetworks_2020_Logo.png

2864 ms

vm-logo.png

vm-logo.png

2588 ms

uipath.png

uipath.png

3203 ms

cambiar.png

cambiar.png

3234 ms

201804243f0f477c-7a1e-605c-bd43-af0e6701353f-1.png

201804243f0f477c-7a1e-605c-bd43-af0e6701353f-1.png

2345 ms

2018042479e25270-5c00-b22d-be05-2f052a87c815.jpg

2018042479e25270-5c00-b22d-be05-2f052a87c815.jpg

2490 ms

201804240819590c-454d-efd8-14fa-f89235490b1e.png

201804240819590c-454d-efd8-14fa-f89235490b1e.png

2564 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

242 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

39 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

114 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

137 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

138 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

137 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

138 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

139 ms

newspaper-icons.woff

newspaper-icons.woff

2506 ms

newspaper.woff

newspaper.woff

3076 ms

td-multipurpose.ttf

td-multipurpose.ttf

3384 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3369 ms

151 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

2963 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

2964 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

3653 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

3795 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

3733 ms

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

3807 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

71 ms

Accessibility Review

buffercode.in accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

buffercode.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

buffercode.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buffercode.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buffercode.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

buffercode.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Buffercode. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: