Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

buglecall.org

Bugle Call - Supporting America First Policies That Will Make America Great Again

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

960 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

804 ms

buglecall.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bugle Call content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about buglecall.org

Supporting America First policies that will Make America Great Again

Visit buglecall.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Buglecall.org page load time and found that the first response time was 960 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Buglecall.org rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

buglecall.org performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,130 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.172

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

buglecall.org

960 ms

www.buglecall.org

1235 ms

template.css

57 ms

template.css

650 ms

bootstrap.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 198 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Buglecall.org, 11% (22 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Buglecall.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (42%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Buglecall.org main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 73.6 kB

  • Original 97.4 kB
  • After minification 90.7 kB
  • After compression 23.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 464.4 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bugle Call needs image optimization as it can save up to 464.4 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 596.7 kB

  • Original 939.2 kB
  • After minification 936.6 kB
  • After compression 342.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 596.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 429.1 kB

  • Original 507.2 kB
  • After minification 462.6 kB
  • After compression 78.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buglecall.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 429.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 105 (61%)

Requests Now

172

After Optimization

67

The browser has sent 172 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bugle Call. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

buglecall.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

buglecall.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

buglecall.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buglecall.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buglecall.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bugle Call. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: