8.7 sec in total
3 sec
5.3 sec
423 ms
Click here to check amazing Bujo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bujo.store
Visit bujo.storeWe analyzed Bujo.store page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
bujo.store performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
2979 ms
167 ms
194 ms
46 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Bujo.store, 7% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Bujo.store.
Page size can be reduced by 175.3 kB (24%)
723.4 kB
548.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Bujo.store main page is 723.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 313.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 161.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bujo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bujo.store has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (72%)
103
29
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bujo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bujo.store
2979 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
167 ms
shortcodes.css
194 ms
jquery.selectBox.css
46 ms
font-awesome.css
189 ms
prettyPhoto.css
191 ms
style.css
56 ms
wcpb-frontend.css
74 ms
wcvs-frontend.css
218 ms
frontend.css
93 ms
css
52 ms
font-awesome.min.css
106 ms
font-stroke.min.css
117 ms
slick.css
134 ms
animate.css
143 ms
style.css
176 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
344 ms
frontend.min.css
419 ms
swiper.min.css
191 ms
post-5988.css
486 ms
post-5929.css
341 ms
font-stroke.min.css
200 ms
smartslider.min.css
215 ms
css
61 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
358 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
224 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
240 ms
hooks.min.js
252 ms
w.js
35 ms
jquery.min.js
267 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
283 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
295 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
305 ms
js.cookie.min.js
315 ms
woocommerce.min.js
326 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
342 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
543 ms
jquery.yitpopup.min.js
540 ms
underscore.min.js
358 ms
wp-util.min.js
512 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
323 ms
n2.min.js
330 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
360 ms
ss-simple.min.js
588 ms
w-bullet.min.js
334 ms
email-decode.min.js
333 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
326 ms
accounting.min.js
336 ms
selectWoo.full.min.js
380 ms
yith-wcan-shortcodes.min.js
492 ms
jquery.selectBox.min.js
358 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
493 ms
jquery.yith-wcwl.min.js
356 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
404 ms
order-attribution.min.js
499 ms
wcpb-frontend.js
466 ms
wcvs-frontend.js
445 ms
slick.min.js
436 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
436 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
639 ms
scrollreveal.min.js
430 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
606 ms
core.min.js
600 ms
menu.min.js
590 ms
dom-ready.min.js
516 ms
i18n.min.js
571 ms
a11y.min.js
496 ms
autocomplete.min.js
495 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
546 ms
theme.js
539 ms
3rd.js
628 ms
forms.js
607 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
611 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
648 ms
waypoints.min.js
470 ms
frontend.min.js
582 ms
frontend.min.js
453 ms
g.gif
141 ms
Se3fe1b44113843ac9814b2355461abc1A.jpg_640x640.jpg
1484 ms
logo-2x.png
87 ms
payment2.png
102 ms
sbi-sprite.png
440 ms
hamburger-black.svg
556 ms
bujostore-1.png
562 ms
bujostore@2x-1.png
566 ms
slider1.png
1434 ms
slider2.png
1571 ms
slider3.png
1535 ms
bullet-journals-stacked-768x1024.jpeg
780 ms
S90cd0aca886c4e2a981cea5c19bd23b0x.jpg_640x640.jpg
465 ms
pens.jpg
773 ms
img-89.png
644 ms
img-90.png
810 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
35 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff
93 ms
font
131 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
168 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff
169 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff
168 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff
168 ms
Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff
985 ms
kmKhZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNcWx8QCg.woff
169 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1460 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1016 ms
img-37.png
1125 ms
img-69.png
1141 ms
img-70.png
1276 ms
img-139.png
1297 ms
img-48.png
1430 ms
img-132.png
1251 ms
img-141.png
1359 ms
img-33.png
1370 ms
img-91.png
1310 ms
img-92.png
1398 ms
img-40.png
1408 ms
img-3.png
1268 ms
img-34.png
1287 ms
placeholder.png
1288 ms
bujo.store accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bujo.store best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
bujo.store SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bujo.store can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bujo.store main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bujo.store
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bujo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: