Tools & Wizards About Us
burryport.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

burryport.org

burryport.org - burryport Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

2.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

173 ms

burryport.org screenshot

About Website

Visit burryport.org now to see the best up-to-date Burryport content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about burryport.org

burryport.org is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, burryport.org has it all. We hope you find...

Visit burryport.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Burryport.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

burryport.org performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

burryport.org

2105 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

350 ms

style.min.css

349 ms

style.css

517 ms

style.css

360 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Burryport.org, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Burryport.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

160.9 kB

After Optimization

125.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Burryport.org main page is 160.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 68.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 34.8 kB
  • After minification 33.3 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 330 B

  • Original 68.3 kB
  • After minification 68.3 kB
  • After compression 68.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 57.8 kB
  • After minification 57.8 kB
  • After compression 50.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Burryport.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (90%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Burryport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

burryport.org

burryport.org

2105 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

350 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

349 ms

style.css

style.css

517 ms

style.css

style.css

360 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

362 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

507 ms

perfect-scrollbar.min.css

perfect-scrollbar.min.css

511 ms

css

css

40 ms

gutenberg.min.css

gutenberg.min.css

526 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

701 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

674 ms

custom.js

custom.js

180 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

1906 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

178 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

176 ms

owlcarousel2-a11ylayer.min.js

owlcarousel2-a11ylayer.min.js

172 ms

perfect-scrollbar.min.js

perfect-scrollbar.min.js

170 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

339 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

342 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

346 ms

modal-accessibility.min.js

modal-accessibility.min.js

353 ms

9Btx3DZF0dXLMZlywRbVRNhxy2LscnM.woff

9Btx3DZF0dXLMZlywRbVRNhxy2LscnM.woff

18 ms

Accessibility Review

burryport.org accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

burryport.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

burryport.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Burryport.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Burryport.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

burryport.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Burryport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: