2.9 sec in total
90 ms
1.8 sec
993 ms
Click here to check amazing Business Mapping content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about businessmapping.com
Business Enterprise Mapping
Visit businessmapping.comWe analyzed Businessmapping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
businessmapping.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value27.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value1,130 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.568
12/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
90 ms
180 ms
40 ms
59 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Businessmapping.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (902 ms) belongs to the original domain Businessmapping.com.
Page size can be reduced by 458.3 kB (10%)
4.5 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Businessmapping.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 48.1 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.8 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 204.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Business Mapping images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 76.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Businessmapping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 43% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (43%)
83
47
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Business Mapping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
businessmapping.com
90 ms
www.businessmapping.com
180 ms
bootstrap.min.css
40 ms
animate.css
59 ms
all.min.css
86 ms
fontello.css
70 ms
flaticon.css
74 ms
themify-icons.css
72 ms
slick.css
71 ms
prettyPhoto.css
74 ms
shortcodes.css
104 ms
main.css
109 ms
megamenu.css
91 ms
responsive.css
93 ms
rs6.css
94 ms
e64a3589b1.js
284 ms
js
89 ms
js
126 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
120 ms
jquery-migrate-3.3.2.min.js
104 ms
bootstrap.bundle.js
145 ms
jquery-validate.js
110 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
119 ms
slick.min.js
118 ms
jquery-waypoints.js
120 ms
numinate.min.js
123 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
134 ms
circle-progress.min.js
133 ms
main.js
133 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
162 ms
rs6.min.js
167 ms
slider.js
148 ms
css2
36 ms
css2
53 ms
e64a3589b1.css
83 ms
font-awesome-css.min.css
28 ms
js
247 ms
mbhaqqhj3d
552 ms
bem-logo.png
243 ms
embed
791 ms
slide-1b.jpg
858 ms
slide-2.jpg
851 ms
process-improvement.jpg
339 ms
process-management.jpg
795 ms
why-engage.jpg
530 ms
client-24.png
339 ms
client-2.png
530 ms
client-3.png
531 ms
client-4.png
747 ms
client-25.png
747 ms
client-26.png
747 ms
client-7.png
792 ms
client-8.png
793 ms
client-9.png
792 ms
client-27.png
796 ms
client-28.png
796 ms
client-12.png
795 ms
client-13.png
797 ms
client-14.png
846 ms
client-15.png
847 ms
client-16.png
846 ms
client-18.png
846 ms
client-19.png
852 ms
client-20.png
852 ms
client-21.png
852 ms
client-22.png
852 ms
client-23.png
853 ms
broken-processes.jpg
881 ms
process-management-2.jpg
867 ms
process-improvement-2.jpg
866 ms
perigon-method.jpg
868 ms
perigon-delivery.jpg
866 ms
perigon-playbook.jpg
868 ms
broken-processes-sign.jpg
902 ms
solutions-sign.jpg
881 ms
perigon-sign.jpg
663 ms
font
565 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
306 ms
fontello.woff
549 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
533 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
375 ms
flaticon.ttf
377 ms
col-bgimage-10.png
375 ms
clarity.js
111 ms
spm-guide-cover.jpg
160 ms
team-2pic.jpg
238 ms
footer-bg.png
201 ms
js
117 ms
bem-logo2.png
194 ms
loader.gif
193 ms
businessmapping.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
businessmapping.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
businessmapping.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Businessmapping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Businessmapping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
businessmapping.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Business Mapping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: