1.5 sec in total
185 ms
992 ms
344 ms
Visit buzzboom.com now to see the best up-to-date Buzzboom content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about buzzboom.com
Marketing agency providing media rich customer experiences and interactions with your brand leveraging technology and experience.
Visit buzzboom.comWe analyzed Buzzboom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
buzzboom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value1.098
1/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
185 ms
24 ms
30 ms
37 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Buzzboom.com, 24% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (386 ms) belongs to the original domain Buzzboom.com.
Page size can be reduced by 162.2 kB (10%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Buzzboom.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 998.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Buzzboom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 37.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.0 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buzzboom.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (83%)
63
11
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buzzboom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
buzzboom.com
185 ms
wp-filebase.css
24 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
30 ms
view.css
37 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
28 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
25 ms
style.css
36 ms
style.css
38 ms
style.css
47 ms
css
50 ms
cff-style.min.css
37 ms
font-awesome.min.css
53 ms
formreset.min.css
51 ms
formsmain.min.css
91 ms
readyclass.min.css
84 ms
browsers.min.css
54 ms
surbma-divi-gravity-forms.css
54 ms
style-static.min.css
56 ms
jetpack.css
85 ms
jquery.min.js
100 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
110 ms
preloader-script.js
100 ms
jquery.json.min.js
123 ms
gravityforms.min.js
157 ms
et-divi-customizer-global.min.css
123 ms
comment_count.js
120 ms
comment_embed.js
119 ms
9452723.js
131 ms
scripts.js
85 ms
scripts.min.js
131 ms
scripts.js
128 ms
idle-timer.min.js
128 ms
custom.js
127 ms
smoothscroll.js
127 ms
cff-scripts.min.js
127 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
165 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
164 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
167 ms
dom-ready.min.js
166 ms
hooks.min.js
164 ms
i18n.min.js
176 ms
a11y.min.js
177 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
176 ms
gfsignature_delete_signature.min.js
177 ms
common.js
177 ms
e-202436.js
160 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
262 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
287 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
286 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
281 ms
easypiechart.js
386 ms
salvattore.js
275 ms
wa_tacoma_seo-agencies_2022.svg
384 ms
wa_tacoma_seo-agencies_2020_inverse.svg
231 ms
466.svg
233 ms
Hdr-Logo-wht.svg
236 ms
BuzzBoom-ChaletBowl-BlogPost-800x675.png
259 ms
Impress-1080x675.jpg
254 ms
Wht-Logo-New-01.svg
234 ms
analytics.js
70 ms
preloader.gif
236 ms
count.js
65 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
145 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
197 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
199 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
225 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff
226 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
224 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
223 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
221 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
220 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
226 ms
collect
86 ms
modules.woff
303 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYw.woff
49 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYA.ttf
50 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYw.woff
50 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYA.ttf
54 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUhiYw.woff
54 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUhiYA.ttf
56 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUhiYw.woff
57 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUhiYA.ttf
56 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUhiYw.woff
57 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUhiYA.ttf
59 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUhiYw.woff
57 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUhiYA.ttf
59 ms
js
157 ms
buzzboom-polygon.jpg
28 ms
coding-wordpress.jpg
29 ms
style.min.css
12 ms
buzzboom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
buzzboom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
buzzboom.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buzzboom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buzzboom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
buzzboom.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Buzzboom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: