Tools & Wizards About Us
byet.host screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

byet.host

Free Hosting, Paid Hosting, Reseller Services & VPS Servers : Byet Internet

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

252 ms

byet.host screenshot

About Website

Welcome to byet.host homepage info - get ready to check Byet best content for Egypt right away, or after learning these important things about byet.host

Providing quality free web hosting, paid cPanel premium hosting, reseller services, VPS servers, dedicated servers. business class hosting, managed and supported by Byet in our data center.

Visit byet.host

Key Findings

We analyzed Byet.host page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

byet.host performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.303

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

byet.host

181 ms

byet.host

448 ms

style.css

168 ms

jquery.min.js

25 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

244 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Byet.host, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (595 ms) belongs to the original domain Byet.host.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 539.4 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Byet.host main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 952.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 26.3 kB

  • Original 952.3 kB
  • After minification 926.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Byet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 163.1 kB

  • Original 262.8 kB
  • After minification 233.5 kB
  • After compression 99.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 163.1 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 328.9 kB

  • Original 376.2 kB
  • After minification 308.0 kB
  • After compression 47.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Byet.host needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 328.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (47%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Byet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

byet.host

byet.host

181 ms

byet.host

byet.host

448 ms

style.css

style.css

168 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

25 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

244 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

337 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

343 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

428 ms

bs.css

bs.css

428 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

264 ms

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js

241 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

321 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

342 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

347 ms

custom.js

custom.js

348 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

396 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

342 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

346 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

347 ms

animate.css

animate.css

432 ms

hover.css

hover.css

433 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

511 ms

bootstrap-theme.css

bootstrap-theme.css

430 ms

css

css

22 ms

css

css

39 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

131 ms

logo.png

logo.png

171 ms

solid-bg.jpg

solid-bg.jpg

129 ms

slider-rack-bg-3.jpg

slider-rack-bg-3.jpg

344 ms

slider-map.jpg

slider-map.jpg

172 ms

slider-rack-bg-2.jpg

slider-rack-bg-2.jpg

172 ms

clouds.png

clouds.png

161 ms

01.png

01.png

171 ms

02.png

02.png

242 ms

03.png

03.png

256 ms

04.png

04.png

257 ms

05.png

05.png

258 ms

06.png

06.png

257 ms

feature-1.jpg

feature-1.jpg

401 ms

feature-2.jpg

feature-2.jpg

595 ms

feature-3.jpg

feature-3.jpg

344 ms

partner-1.png

partner-1.png

342 ms

partner-2.png

partner-2.png

342 ms

partner-3.png

partner-3.png

428 ms

partner-4.png

partner-4.png

427 ms

partner-5.png

partner-5.png

429 ms

partner-6.png

partner-6.png

431 ms

clouds-2.png

clouds-2.png

480 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

57 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

56 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

73 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

58 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

58 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

56 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

57 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

524 ms

style.css

style.css

439 ms

skin.css

skin.css

451 ms

ui.totop.png

ui.totop.png

418 ms

Accessibility Review

byet.host accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

byet.host best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

byet.host SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Byet.host can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Byet.host main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

byet.host

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Byet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: