2.6 sec in total
47 ms
2.1 sec
430 ms
Welcome to bytebucket.org homepage info - get ready to check Bytebucket best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bytebucket.org
Bitbucket Cloud is a Git-based code and CI/CD tool optimized for teams using Jira.
Visit bytebucket.orgWe analyzed Bytebucket.org page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
bytebucket.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.2 s
0/100
10%
Value13.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.183
66/100
15%
Value21.1 s
1/100
10%
47 ms
177 ms
50 ms
64 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Bytebucket.org, 5% (3 requests) were made to Pixel.prfct.co and 5% (3 requests) were made to Pixel-geo.prfct.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Api.segment.io.
Page size can be reduced by 600.4 kB (54%)
1.1 MB
519.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Bytebucket.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 815.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bytebucket images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 560.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 560.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bytebucket.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (60%)
57
23
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bytebucket. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
bitbucket.org
47 ms
1096093.js
177 ms
homepage.css
50 ms
marketing.js
64 ms
geo2.js
158 ms
event
79 ms
bitbucket-logo-blue.svg
53 ms
showcase-pull-requests.png
56 ms
showcase-deployment.png
56 ms
spotlight-branch-management.png
78 ms
integration-features-jira.png
65 ms
integration-features-connect.png
67 ms
integration-features-webhooks.png
81 ms
testimonial-background.jpg
82 ms
testimonial-logo.png
65 ms
salesforce-logo-nocloud.svg
66 ms
tesla-logo.svg
70 ms
nytimes-logo.svg
78 ms
paypal-logo.svg
77 ms
dhl-logo.svg
82 ms
plans-cloud.png
117 ms
atlassian-logo-grey.svg
117 ms
ga.js
98 ms
circularpro-bold.woff
333 ms
circularpro-book.woff
121 ms
event
11 ms
inpage_linkid.js
58 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
collect
56 ms
nr-885.min.js
168 ms
atl-analytics.min.js
42 ms
analytics.min.js
37 ms
p
1201 ms
roundtrip.js
122 ms
gtm.js
75 ms
52fea02fe80b62197f000063.js
121 ms
a2cef8c3d3
166 ms
nls.js
59 ms
RRL33P34Y5CQTPBX4567UK.js
71 ms
tagjs
4 ms
84 ms
adsct
204 ms
Pug
117 ms
out
71 ms
tr
85 ms
tr
85 ms
u.php
126 ms
sync
146 ms
adsct
141 ms
pixel
100 ms
cb
127 ms
ncm
91 ms
120 ms
sd
89 ms
tap.php
55 ms
pixel
56 ms
tap.php
44 ms
cb
18 ms
sd
33 ms
377928.gif
20 ms
in
5 ms
cb
622 ms
atl-path.html
12 ms
bytebucket.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
bytebucket.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bytebucket.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bytebucket.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bytebucket.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bytebucket.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bytebucket. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: