1 sec in total
139 ms
819 ms
53 ms
Welcome to byteflows.com homepage info - get ready to check Byteflow S best content right away, or after learning these important things about byteflows.com
We believe anything is possible with the right AI support team. Whether you're exploring new Machine Learning products, building Data Science teams, or scaling up existing products, we've got you cove...
Visit byteflows.comWe analyzed Byteflows.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 872 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
byteflows.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value4.0 s
48/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value590 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
139 ms
33 ms
28 ms
32 ms
117 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Byteflows.com, 44% (18 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 947.2 kB (66%)
1.4 MB
493.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Byteflows.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 894.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 894.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Byteflow S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)
22
12
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Byteflow S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.byteflows.com
139 ms
minified.js
33 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
28 ms
polyfill.min.js
32 ms
thunderbolt-commons.5f3ef9f8.bundle.min.js
117 ms
main.055801ac.bundle.min.js
146 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
116 ms
lodash.min.js
124 ms
react.production.min.js
124 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
135 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
124 ms
edafc906071647ad940aad43e3fdbe07.jpg
125 ms
bundle.min.js
66 ms
favicon.png
376 ms
4167bc84ccf8457e9304fc2a3e3561c0.jpg
80 ms
4d1c9cdd0301cd3bec83fa299c27256f.png
79 ms
92b8b1f80b27a230420312f2b1340a0c.png
269 ms
1c58b0962c9476612c67de6c0393f78c.png
79 ms
85799dffdd98450385a52ff4452a59e7.jpg
177 ms
171 ms
173 ms
170 ms
170 ms
168 ms
168 ms
203 ms
206 ms
207 ms
201 ms
201 ms
202 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
8 ms
cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff
7 ms
80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff
7 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
18 ms
Xyjz-jNkfiYuJf8UC3Lizw.woff
18 ms
idLYXfFa1c7oAPILDl4z0fesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
8 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
11 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
5 ms
byteflows.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
byteflows.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
byteflows.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Byteflows.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Byteflows.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
byteflows.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Byteflow S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: