5.3 sec in total
836 ms
4.1 sec
389 ms
Visit byteplus.com now to see the best up-to-date Byte Plus content for Singapore and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about byteplus.com
Build better products, deliver richer experiences, and accelerate growth through our wide range of intelligent solutions.
Visit byteplus.comWe analyzed Byteplus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 836 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
byteplus.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value21.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value1,120 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.263
47/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
836 ms
1207 ms
259 ms
325 ms
342 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Byteplus.com, 66% (51 requests) were made to Sf16-resources.bytepluscdn.com and 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Byteplus.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (25%)
5.3 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Byteplus.com main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 606.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 606.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Byte Plus images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 519.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 519.6 kB or 39% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (59%)
64
26
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Byte Plus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.byteplus.com
836 ms
en
1207 ms
b964e9868fc66d87.css
259 ms
325e531c634459dd.css
325 ms
9ed98a73a1d1e4d4.css
342 ms
995432f8c4f59fb2.css
340 ms
3cf2ca3f1f969cac.css
458 ms
2df19aac52d938b7.css
321 ms
d109a4ed7b61d7ee.css
330 ms
91debb659bf59f3f.css
401 ms
e8129642dfccd38e.css
367 ms
a8881ecf74696ff0.css
369 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
1520 ms
8482.8e1fe2bcda9beead.js
427 ms
8130.f6e0f79d5ccf5df8.js
399 ms
1028.4bef1cfdc94468ce.js
393 ms
1044.51f4f7a94d9e60b8.js
461 ms
1950-83d4eeabb714a315.js
445 ms
5574.17e774ea4467bdf6.js
536 ms
8333.ff0bb209d49b3037.js
458 ms
webpack-1eefe2220e01b7a1.js
459 ms
framework-f33d2b9833e1ad56.js
513 ms
main-0e393eceafb1071a.js
479 ms
_app-261c46666e7b2b58.js
472 ms
334-8659e2166ad60ed8.js
523 ms
5856-9b81b257e26c0ec7.js
523 ms
1819-184ed34792b2bf24.js
556 ms
9166-50b56e70cddee483.js
516 ms
535-ba67ecc30b178068.js
583 ms
2244-53623a283a28fa14.js
595 ms
7369-f8d5aa686d479550.js
819 ms
5274-b9adb4780db28b31.js
581 ms
1373-70df38535a05fbd0.js
624 ms
2306-a3fc884a6c2846ca.js
819 ms
8343-a54c75b86854cb77.js
587 ms
2685-7de3ca393c36b9f2.js
618 ms
4681-f07102b078c4467f.js
644 ms
8250-ea1e4d71bed537cc.js
634 ms
442-0a32e8d34bdb2ada.js
409 ms
index-0bc4bb73c99bdfb9.js
360 ms
_buildManifest.js
330 ms
_ssgManifest.js
331 ms
app_banner_bg.jpeg
319 ms
cc-4-b-330-x-420-ce339601-d3fd-4f27-92d5-9083d029aeb3.jpg
161 ms
frame-2036082499-93d5dc51-3185-4939-a892-1587127cd52c.png
365 ms
frame-2036082500-45a3e9cb-d896-42c0-b612-0ddf9e30760c.png
315 ms
banner_bg_desktop.jpg
2091 ms
image
2151 ms
image
921 ms
image
921 ms
image
923 ms
image
935 ms
image
1207 ms
image
1084 ms
image
1108 ms
image
1170 ms
image
1762 ms
image
1335 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff
153 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff
174 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZs.woff
201 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff
202 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff
200 ms
-F6jfjtqLzI2JPCgQBnw7HFyzSD-AsregP8VFCMj75g.woff
321 ms
-F6jfjtqLzI2JPCgQBnw7HFyzSD-AsregP8VFBEj75g.woff
275 ms
-F6jfjtqLzI2JPCgQBnw7HFyzSD-AsregP8VFPYk75g.woff
259 ms
PbyxFmXiEBPT4ITbgNA5Cgms3VYcOA-vvnIzztgyeLc.woff
305 ms
PbyxFmXiEBPT4ITbgNA5Cgms3VYcOA-vvnIzzuoyeLc.woff
290 ms
PbyxFmXiEBPT4ITbgNA5Cgms3VYcOA-vvnIzzg01eLc.woff
272 ms
funcorp-1920-800-523668cc-ee56-4d40-8fbb-54e51a3127d6.jpg
145 ms
funcrop-07ead35e-f44e-4a57-95a4-11fb9147b2da.png
138 ms
baitoru-1920-800-75b509dc-95b9-41b3-b9ea-fa1499cac6a2.jpg
189 ms
baitoru-d271c565-9c5f-4910-b81b-449086b6e53b.png
383 ms
tellernovel-1920-800-d98864ce-aa3a-4581-b192-f86056de7668.jpg
261 ms
teller-novel-79a2b8ed-27af-4222-912a-fc47d5d8ee98.png
307 ms
zoomerang-6a243b8c-73c3-472f-b934-76a933db0d5a.jpeg
507 ms
zoomerang-03647b00-67f7-4ff6-b317-162d18b74923.png
401 ms
byteplus.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
byteplus.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
byteplus.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Byteplus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Byteplus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
byteplus.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Byte Plus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: