Tools & Wizards About Us
dating.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

dating.bookmarking.site

Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2018, New Social Bookmarking Sites 2018

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

293 ms

dating.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dating.bookmarking.site homepage info - get ready to check Dating Bookmarking best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about dating.bookmarking.site

Dofollow Social Bookmarking Site for Weight Loss to get instant backlinks, this will play a very important role in improving search engine position of your site.

Visit dating.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Dating.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dating.bookmarking.site performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,130 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dating.bookmarking.site

1872 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

327 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

224 ms

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

230 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Dating.bookmarking.site, 12% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Dating.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.4 kB (26%)

Content Size

401.7 kB

After Optimization

298.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dating.bookmarking.site main page is 401.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 166.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 100.6 kB
  • After minification 77.5 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.1 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 562 B

  • Original 94.9 kB
  • After minification 94.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dating Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 166.6 kB
  • After minification 166.6 kB
  • After compression 160.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dating.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (63%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dating Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dating.bookmarking.site

dating.bookmarking.site

1872 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

327 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

224 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

230 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

224 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

custom.js

custom.js

231 ms

js

js

39 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

604 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

225 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

23 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

783 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

2056 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

214 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

38 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

6 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

10 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

354 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

431 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

532 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

693 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

45 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

46 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

113 ms

kS2lzJBl.jpg

kS2lzJBl.jpg

98 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

461 ms

209926_32.jpg

209926_32.jpg

289 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

54 ms

js

js

70 ms

collect

collect

54 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

1197 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

1795 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

2335 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

2234 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

363 ms

Accessibility Review

dating.bookmarking.site accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

dating.bookmarking.site best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dating.bookmarking.site SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dating.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Dating.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dating.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dating Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: