Tools & Wizards About Us
destinations.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

destinations.bookmarking.site

Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2018, New Social Bookmarking Sites 2018

Page Load Speed

30.7 sec in total

First Response

4.2 sec

Resources Loaded

26.2 sec

Page Rendered

406 ms

destinations.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Destinations Bookmarking content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about destinations.bookmarking.site

Dofollow Social Bookmarking Site for Weight Loss to get instant backlinks, this will play a very important role in improving search engine position of your site.

Visit destinations.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Destinations.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 4.2 sec and then it took 26.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 3 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

destinations.bookmarking.site performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

destinations.bookmarking.site

4162 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

483 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

29 ms

font-awesome.min.css

815 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

343 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Destinations.bookmarking.site, 12% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Destinations.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 252.3 kB (44%)

Content Size

579.4 kB

After Optimization

327.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Destinations.bookmarking.site main page is 579.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 316.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 85.1 kB

  • Original 99.2 kB
  • After minification 76.1 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.1 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 124.1 kB
  • After minification 124.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Destinations Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 156.3 kB

  • Original 316.6 kB
  • After minification 316.6 kB
  • After compression 160.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.3 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Destinations.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (65%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Destinations Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

destinations.bookmarking.site

destinations.bookmarking.site

4162 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

483 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

29 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

815 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

343 ms

style.css

style.css

29 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

3428 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

38 ms

custom.js

custom.js

349 ms

js

js

106 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

502 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

344 ms

custom.js

custom.js

19688 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1739 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

822 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

794 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

30 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

10 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

9 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

2465 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

995 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

1450 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

1771 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

20188 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

11013 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

19949 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

66 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

112 ms

vday.jpg

vday.jpg

151 ms

kS2lzJBl.jpg

kS2lzJBl.jpg

145 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

8688 ms

js

js

84 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

86 ms

collect

collect

42 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

collect

collect

4 ms

collect

collect

5 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

328 ms

Accessibility Review

destinations.bookmarking.site accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

destinations.bookmarking.site best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

destinations.bookmarking.site SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Destinations.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Destinations.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

destinations.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Destinations Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: