Tools & Wizards About Us
gallery.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

gallery.bookmarking.site

Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2018, New Social Bookmarking Sites 2018

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

427 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

365 ms

gallery.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gallery Bookmarking content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gallery.bookmarking.site

Dofollow Social Bookmarking Site for Weight Loss to get instant backlinks, this will play a very important role in improving search engine position of your site.

Visit gallery.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Gallery.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 427 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gallery.bookmarking.site performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,430 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gallery.bookmarking.site

427 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

309 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

223 ms

font-awesome.min.css

222 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

218 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Gallery.bookmarking.site, 16% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) belongs to the original domain Gallery.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 165.3 kB (48%)

Content Size

343.8 kB

After Optimization

178.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gallery.bookmarking.site main page is 343.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 194.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 87.9 kB

  • Original 101.1 kB
  • After minification 77.9 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.2 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gallery Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 194.4 kB
  • After minification 194.4 kB
  • After compression 128.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gallery.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (66%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gallery Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gallery.bookmarking.site

gallery.bookmarking.site

427 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

309 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

223 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

222 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

218 ms

style.css

style.css

210 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

259 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

custom.js

custom.js

406 ms

js

js

45 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

218 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

31 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

11 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

17 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

333 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

385 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

376 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

372 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

279 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

41 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

42 ms

kS2lzJBl.jpg

kS2lzJBl.jpg

125 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

202 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

86 ms

js

js

66 ms

collect

collect

77 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

378 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

Accessibility Review

gallery.bookmarking.site accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

gallery.bookmarking.site best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gallery.bookmarking.site SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gallery.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gallery.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gallery.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gallery Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: