Tools & Wizards About Us
go.biscom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

go.biscom.com

Biscom: The World Leading Fax & Secure File Transfer Provider

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

210 ms

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

769 ms

go.biscom.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to go.biscom.com homepage info - get ready to check Go Biscom best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about go.biscom.com

Biscom pioneered secure messaging and continues to innovate the most advanced and intelligent fax and secure messaging solutions for enterprises.

Visit go.biscom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Go.biscom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

go.biscom.com performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,100 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.425

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

go.biscom.com

210 ms

go.biscom.com

302 ms

biscom.com

1115 ms

www.biscom.com

1506 ms

slick.min.css

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Go.biscom.com, 66% (61 requests) were made to Biscom.com and 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Biscom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 270.1 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Go.biscom.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 223.1 kB

  • Original 262.6 kB
  • After minification 262.5 kB
  • After compression 39.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 223.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Go Biscom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 44.8 kB

  • Original 180.1 kB
  • After minification 179.7 kB
  • After compression 135.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.8 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 308 B

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 38.4 kB
  • After compression 38.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Go.biscom.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (58%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Go Biscom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

go.biscom.com

go.biscom.com

210 ms

go.biscom.com

go.biscom.com

302 ms

biscom.com

biscom.com

1115 ms

www.biscom.com

www.biscom.com

1506 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

167 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.css

jquery.bxslider.min.css

212 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

208 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

211 ms

wp-carousel-pro-public.min.css

wp-carousel-pro-public.min.css

206 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

204 ms

search-filter.min.css

search-filter.min.css

256 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

199 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

202 ms

popupaoc-public.css

popupaoc-public.css

197 ms

css

css

300 ms

style.css

style.css

172 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

296 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

296 ms

search-filter-divi.js

search-filter-divi.js

296 ms

search-filter-build.min.js

search-filter-build.min.js

294 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

296 ms

js

js

297 ms

js

js

685 ms

et-core-unified-42718.min.css

et-core-unified-42718.min.css

641 ms

css

css

635 ms

popupaoc-public.js

popupaoc-public.js

632 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

631 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

632 ms

biscom.js

biscom.js

510 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

633 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

636 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

710 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

711 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

710 ms

common.js

common.js

712 ms

preloader.min.js

preloader.min.js

712 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

740 ms

wp-carousel-pro-public.min.js

wp-carousel-pro-public.min.js

739 ms

motion-effects.js

motion-effects.js

705 ms

munchkin.js

munchkin.js

509 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

316 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

403 ms

Biscom2.png

Biscom2.png

401 ms

icon-transmit.png

icon-transmit.png

400 ms

icon-automate.png

icon-automate.png

399 ms

Icon-optimize.png

Icon-optimize.png

401 ms

logo-mgh.png

logo-mgh.png

408 ms

logo-dana-farber.png

logo-dana-farber.png

404 ms

logo-intermex.png

logo-intermex.png

425 ms

logo-harbor-one.png

logo-harbor-one.png

405 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

402 ms

logo-canon.png

logo-canon.png

405 ms

logo-cerner.png

logo-cerner.png

423 ms

logo-epic.png

logo-epic.png

421 ms

logo-hp.png

logo-hp.png

422 ms

International-Presence.png

International-Presence.png

441 ms

logo-kyocera.png

logo-kyocera.png

440 ms

Siemens.png

Siemens.png

769 ms

STR-Software.png

STR-Software.png

438 ms

Tiffin.png

Tiffin.png

749 ms

Virence.png

Virence.png

752 ms

Xerox.png

Xerox.png

773 ms

Biscom-1.png

Biscom-1.png

632 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-885-tb-871-42718-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-885-tb-871-42718-late.css

554 ms

front-header-01.png

front-header-01.png

579 ms

js

js

411 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

178 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

957 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

1054 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

1070 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

1071 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

1020 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff

1018 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

1015 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

1017 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

1019 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff

1016 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

1018 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

896 ms

munchkin.js

munchkin.js

911 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

1502 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

1490 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

842 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

155 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

493 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

492 ms

visitWebPage

visitWebPage

386 ms

collect

collect

101 ms

148 ms

collect

collect

109 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

41 ms

26 ms

22 ms

Accessibility Review

go.biscom.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

go.biscom.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

go.biscom.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Go.biscom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Go.biscom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

go.biscom.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Go Biscom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: