Tools & Wizards About Us
handtool.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

handtool.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

24.3 sec in total

First Response

835 ms

Resources Loaded

23 sec

Page Rendered

454 ms

handtool.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Handtool Bookmarking content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about handtool.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit handtool.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Handtool.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 835 ms and then it took 23.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 8 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

handtool.bookmarking.site performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,130 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

handtool.bookmarking.site

835 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

244 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

188 ms

font-awesome.min.css

179 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Handtool.bookmarking.site, 13% (8 requests) were made to Aax-eu.amazon-adsystem.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Ir-in.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Ir-in.amazon-adsystem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.8 kB (44%)

Content Size

296.5 kB

After Optimization

164.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Handtool.bookmarking.site main page is 296.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 170.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

  • Original 103.6 kB
  • After minification 84.0 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Handtool Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 170.6 kB
  • After minification 170.6 kB
  • After compression 132.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 18.1 kB
  • After minification 16.1 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Handtool.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (57%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Handtool Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

handtool.bookmarking.site

handtool.bookmarking.site

835 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

244 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

188 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

179 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

169 ms

style.css

style.css

175 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

238 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

custom.js

custom.js

331 ms

js

js

52 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

180 ms

assoc.js

assoc.js

17 ms

assoc.js

assoc.js

18 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

26 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

7 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

10 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

275 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

278 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

285 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

414 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

232 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

57 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

57 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

53 ms

382471_32.jpg

382471_32.jpg

211 ms

382463_32.jpg

382463_32.jpg

54 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

43 ms

js

js

86 ms

collect

collect

120 ms

getad

getad

422 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

297 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

4 ms

collect

collect

10 ms

collect

collect

10 ms

collect

collect

35 ms

assoc_lra.html

assoc_lra.html

9 ms

getad

getad

161 ms

assoc_lra.html

assoc_lra.html

7 ms

ir

ir

20171 ms

assoc_lra_s1_in_728x90.gif

assoc_lra_s1_in_728x90.gif

2 ms

assoc_lra_s1_in_728x90.gif

assoc_lra_s1_in_728x90.gif

4 ms

iu3

iu3

33 ms

getad

getad

90 ms

ir

ir

20009 ms

iu3

iu3

11 ms

getad

getad

86 ms

ir

ir

19901 ms

iu3

iu3

12 ms

getad

getad

88 ms

ir

ir

19806 ms

iu3

iu3

10 ms

getad

getad

91 ms

ir

ir

19710 ms

iu3

iu3

12 ms

getad

getad

95 ms

ir

ir

19610 ms

iu3

iu3

14 ms

getad

getad

87 ms

ir

ir

19504 ms

iu3

iu3

10 ms

ir

ir

20406 ms

iu3

iu3

12 ms

Accessibility Review

handtool.bookmarking.site accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

handtool.bookmarking.site best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

handtool.bookmarking.site SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Handtool.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Handtool.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

handtool.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Handtool Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: