Tools & Wizards About Us
info.boardevaluations.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

info.boardevaluations.com

Board Evaluations For Highly Effective Boards | Nasdaq

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

342 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

info.boardevaluations.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to info.boardevaluations.com homepage info - get ready to check Info Board Evaluations best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about info.boardevaluations.com

Nasdaq's board assessments technology creates an effective board of directors’ & committee evaluation process. Learn about our Board Evaluations.

Visit info.boardevaluations.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Info.boardevaluations.com page load time and found that the first response time was 342 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

info.boardevaluations.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,510 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

board-evaluations

342 ms

board-evaluations

176 ms

google_tag.script.js

28 ms

css_YQayzHFXFzyRQXVMUVf41KfZdvA1jOkDEbI9OfGCD0s.css

24 ms

css_zwOP0BAtk-BD0vSEw4v5TcuVl1YaBdsfZU2cCbtvMDo.css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Info.boardevaluations.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.bizible.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (363 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 506.7 kB (17%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Info.boardevaluations.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 197.4 kB

  • Original 229.2 kB
  • After minification 179.4 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 117.0 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Info Board Evaluations images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 169.1 kB

  • Original 851.6 kB
  • After minification 851.6 kB
  • After compression 682.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 169.1 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 83.4 kB
  • After minification 82.9 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Info.boardevaluations.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (28%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Info Board Evaluations. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

board-evaluations

board-evaluations

342 ms

board-evaluations

board-evaluations

176 ms

google_tag.script.js

google_tag.script.js

28 ms

css_YQayzHFXFzyRQXVMUVf41KfZdvA1jOkDEbI9OfGCD0s.css

css_YQayzHFXFzyRQXVMUVf41KfZdvA1jOkDEbI9OfGCD0s.css

24 ms

css_zwOP0BAtk-BD0vSEw4v5TcuVl1YaBdsfZU2cCbtvMDo.css

css_zwOP0BAtk-BD0vSEw4v5TcuVl1YaBdsfZU2cCbtvMDo.css

61 ms

SWBnp2Tm.js

SWBnp2Tm.js

42 ms

tcf.stub.js

tcf.stub.js

58 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

91 ms

17855bc2

17855bc2

32 ms

js_O-6BiguKjHwQVhq8aE2oQTJpw5hbDrMI-smudcViPEM.js

js_O-6BiguKjHwQVhq8aE2oQTJpw5hbDrMI-smudcViPEM.js

84 ms

eu_cookie_compliance.min.js

eu_cookie_compliance.min.js

27 ms

js_vKRn_eASa-ZCgGnwdR97dtuSMj2tUVRp0qjD40tdec4.js

js_vKRn_eASa-ZCgGnwdR97dtuSMj2tUVRp0qjD40tdec4.js

83 ms

forms2.min.js

forms2.min.js

338 ms

p.css

p.css

44 ms

578a06dd-f15c-46aa-8b1d-7dfe08fd6747.json

578a06dd-f15c-46aa-8b1d-7dfe08fd6747.json

226 ms

bizible.js

bizible.js

337 ms

D%26OQBanner_0.jpeg

D%26OQBanner_0.jpeg

213 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

363 ms

ActionPoints-01.png

ActionPoints-01.png

132 ms

boardeval2.jpeg

boardeval2.jpeg

142 ms

boardeval3.jpeg

boardeval3.jpeg

134 ms

Byron%20Loflin%20Headshot.jpg

Byron%20Loflin%20Headshot.jpg

143 ms

Phil%20Neiswender%20Headshot%20Edit_CS_2%20%281%29.jpg

Phil%20Neiswender%20Headshot%20Edit_CS_2%20%281%29.jpg

142 ms

Kaley%20Karaffa%20Headshot_0.jpg

Kaley%20Karaffa%20Headshot_0.jpg

145 ms

James-Beasley_0.jpg

James-Beasley_0.jpg

162 ms

Number%209%20-%20SFP%20Headshot_0.jpg

Number%209%20-%20SFP%20Headshot_0.jpg

180 ms

BE%20Number%2011%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-02.png

BE%20Number%2011%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-02.png

180 ms

Overview-3%20A%20well-executed%20evaluation%20drives%20board%20excellence.png

Overview-3%20A%20well-executed%20evaluation%20drives%20board%20excellence.png

144 ms

BE%20Number%2012%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-04.png

BE%20Number%2012%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-04.png

150 ms

Overview-4%20A%20cost-effective%20third%20party%20facilitator.png

Overview-4%20A%20cost-effective%20third%20party%20facilitator.png

176 ms

BE%20Number%2013%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-03.png

BE%20Number%2013%20-%200276-Q22_Finals-03.png

198 ms

Overview-5%20Measurable%20results%20and%20actionable%20insights%20for%20boards.png

Overview-5%20Measurable%20results%20and%20actionable%20insights%20for%20boards.png

162 ms

Number%2014%20-%20AdobeStock_220104112.jpeg

Number%2014%20-%20AdobeStock_220104112.jpeg

177 ms

Number%2015%20-%20AdobeStock_316760692.jpeg

Number%2015%20-%20AdobeStock_316760692.jpeg

180 ms

Number%2016%20-%20AdobeStock_278370910.jpeg

Number%2016%20-%20AdobeStock_278370910.jpeg

179 ms

Number%2024%20-%20AdobeStock_305938477.jpeg

Number%2024%20-%20AdobeStock_305938477.jpeg

195 ms

BEForm.jpg

BEForm.jpg

199 ms

07_bp_software.png

07_bp_software.png

198 ms

08_measure_improve.png

08_measure_improve.png

197 ms

09_promote_efficiency.png

09_promote_efficiency.png

200 ms

10_increase_transparency.png

10_increase_transparency.png

199 ms

Roboto-Regular.woff

Roboto-Regular.woff

200 ms

sourcesanspro-semibold-webfont.woff

sourcesanspro-semibold-webfont.woff

201 ms

nasdaq-icons.ttf

nasdaq-icons.ttf

200 ms

nasdaq-icons.ttf

nasdaq-icons.ttf

202 ms

sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff

sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff

280 ms

location

location

128 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

27 ms

www.nasdaq.com

www.nasdaq.com

81 ms

ipv

ipv

69 ms

u

u

107 ms

nasdaq-icons.woff

nasdaq-icons.woff

20 ms

xdc.js

xdc.js

45 ms

www.nasdaq.com

www.nasdaq.com

15 ms

nasdaq-icons.svg

nasdaq-icons.svg

14 ms

www.nasdaq.com

www.nasdaq.com

12 ms

Accessibility Review

info.boardevaluations.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

info.boardevaluations.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

info.boardevaluations.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Info.boardevaluations.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Info.boardevaluations.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

info.boardevaluations.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Info Board Evaluations. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: