Tools & Wizards About Us
interview.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

interview.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

272 ms

interview.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Visit interview.bookmarking.site now to see the best up-to-date Interview Bookmarking content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interview.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit interview.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Interview.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interview.bookmarking.site performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interview.bookmarking.site

183 ms

www.interview.bookmarking.site

316 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

128 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

127 ms

font-awesome.min.css

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Interview.bookmarking.site, 61% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) belongs to the original domain Interview.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 368.6 kB (68%)

Content Size

544.3 kB

After Optimization

175.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Interview.bookmarking.site main page is 544.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 315.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 94.7 kB

  • Original 109.7 kB
  • After minification 89.3 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interview Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 186.3 kB

  • Original 315.6 kB
  • After minification 315.3 kB
  • After compression 129.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

  • Original 116.3 kB
  • After minification 115.9 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interview.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (91%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interview Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interview.bookmarking.site

interview.bookmarking.site

183 ms

www.interview.bookmarking.site

www.interview.bookmarking.site

316 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

128 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

127 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

122 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

125 ms

style.css

style.css

125 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

132 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

custom.js

custom.js

184 ms

js

js

122 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

35 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

6 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

11 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

296 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

296 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

129 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

130 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

63 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

165 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

205 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

111 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

212 ms

js

js

99 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

43 ms

removed.png

removed.png

113 ms

removed.png

removed.png

107 ms

removed.png

removed.png

106 ms

removed.png

removed.png

106 ms

removed.png

removed.png

106 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

removed.png

removed.png

99 ms

removed.png

removed.png

91 ms

removed.png

removed.png

92 ms

removed.png

removed.png

92 ms

removed.png

removed.png

91 ms

removed.png

removed.png

91 ms

removed.png

removed.png

78 ms

removed.png

removed.png

77 ms

removed.png

removed.png

77 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

41 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

removed.png

removed.png

54 ms

removed.png

removed.png

53 ms

removed.png

removed.png

53 ms

removed.png

removed.png

53 ms

removed.png

removed.png

53 ms

removed.png

removed.png

53 ms

removed.png

removed.png

52 ms

removed.png

removed.png

53 ms

removed.png

removed.png

53 ms

removed.png

removed.png

32 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

33 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

32 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

29 ms

removed.png

removed.png

24 ms

removed.png

removed.png

41 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

32 ms

removed.png

removed.png

32 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

31 ms

removed.png

removed.png

32 ms

removed.png

removed.png

18 ms

removed.png

removed.png

18 ms

removed.png

removed.png

18 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

removed.png

removed.png

13 ms

Accessibility Review

interview.bookmarking.site accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

interview.bookmarking.site best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

interview.bookmarking.site SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interview.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interview.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

interview.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interview Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: