Tools & Wizards About Us
lipitor.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

lipitor.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

532 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

295 ms

lipitor.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lipitor Bookmarking content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lipitor.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit lipitor.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Lipitor.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 532 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lipitor.bookmarking.site performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,630 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lipitor.bookmarking.site

532 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

241 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

20 ms

font-awesome.min.css

172 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Lipitor.bookmarking.site, 11% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (532 ms) belongs to the original domain Lipitor.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 101.6 kB (24%)

Content Size

428.1 kB

After Optimization

326.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lipitor.bookmarking.site main page is 428.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 166.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 83.8 kB

  • Original 100.1 kB
  • After minification 80.4 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 455 B

  • Original 121.9 kB
  • After minification 121.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lipitor Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 166.6 kB
  • After minification 166.6 kB
  • After compression 160.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lipitor.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (59%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lipitor Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lipitor.bookmarking.site

lipitor.bookmarking.site

532 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

241 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

20 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

172 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

166 ms

style.css

style.css

188 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

180 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

25 ms

custom.js

custom.js

223 ms

js

js

58 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

344 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

175 ms

custom.js

custom.js

364 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

28 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

390 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

404 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

26 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

6 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

10 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

317 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

332 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

440 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

466 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

354 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

290 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

310 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

449 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

505 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

41 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

41 ms

vday.jpg

vday.jpg

74 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

170 ms

132821_32.jpg

132821_32.jpg

165 ms

132819_32.jpg

132819_32.jpg

225 ms

132817_32.jpg

132817_32.jpg

244 ms

132796_32.jpg

132796_32.jpg

372 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

37 ms

js

js

83 ms

collect

collect

88 ms

collect

collect

41 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

309 ms

Accessibility Review

lipitor.bookmarking.site accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

lipitor.bookmarking.site best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lipitor.bookmarking.site SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lipitor.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lipitor.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lipitor.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lipitor Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: