2.8 sec in total
586 ms
1.9 sec
340 ms
Visit more.bringg.com now to see the best up-to-date More Bringg content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about more.bringg.com
Bringg's delivery management platform simplifies complex deliveries allowing you to plan, optimize and scale last mile delivery to perfection.
Visit more.bringg.comWe analyzed More.bringg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 586 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
more.bringg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
79/100
10%
Value4.2 s
43/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.213
58/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
586 ms
23 ms
41 ms
99 ms
93 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original More.bringg.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (900 ms) relates to the external source Bringg.safronov.co.il.
Page size can be reduced by 912.6 kB (35%)
2.6 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of More.bringg.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. More Bringg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 203.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 561.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. More.bringg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 561.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (53%)
62
29
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of More Bringg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
more.bringg.com
586 ms
css
23 ms
css
41 ms
bootstrap.css
99 ms
font-awesome.css
93 ms
owl.carousel.css
87 ms
owl.theme.css
89 ms
magnific-popup.css
89 ms
jquery.isotope.css
90 ms
nivo-slider.css
131 ms
default.css
134 ms
component.css
135 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
138 ms
theme.css
141 ms
theme-elements.css
144 ms
theme-blog.css
173 ms
theme-spyropress.css
179 ms
theme-animate.css
184 ms
theme-responsive.css
186 ms
blue.css
181 ms
style.css
192 ms
custom.css
214 ms
dynamic.css
222 ms
builder.css
223 ms
settings.css
238 ms
main.css
389 ms
css
34 ms
jquery-1.9.0.min.js
293 ms
jquery.easing.js
256 ms
bootstrap.js
274 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
273 ms
skrollr.js
284 ms
move.min.js
307 ms
main.js
320 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
296 ms
analytics.js
77 ms
bk.png
900 ms
logo.png
67 ms
phone_1.png
294 ms
phone_2.png
300 ms
phone_3.png
280 ms
ribon_left.png
69 ms
ribon_button.png
67 ms
ribon_right.png
113 ms
phone_4.png
281 ms
home_Movers.png
273 ms
home_Couriers.png
277 ms
home_Food.png
278 ms
home_Services.png
278 ms
home_transport.png
280 ms
13.jpg
281 ms
14.jpg
281 ms
15.jpg
282 ms
16.jpg
288 ms
mobile_marketer.jpg
291 ms
c_bg.png
337 ms
c_coin.png
297 ms
footer_logo.png
299 ms
icon_twitter.png
303 ms
icon_f.png
328 ms
icon_t.png
341 ms
icon_l.png
342 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
18 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
19 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
20 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
19 ms
RXTgOOQ9AAtaVOHxx0IUBOlC2pU_uJZcAXPUd4HCQp8.ttf
19 ms
collect
165 ms
more.bringg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
more.bringg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
more.bringg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise More.bringg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that More.bringg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
more.bringg.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of More Bringg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: