4 sec in total
144 ms
3.5 sec
408 ms
Click here to check amazing Online Project Management Best Reviews content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about online-project-management.bestreviews.net
Online project management tools and software reviews by project management experts. Discover the best online project management apps, free trials, and special offers.
Visit online-project-management.bestreviews.netWe analyzed Online-project-management.bestreviews.net page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
online-project-management.bestreviews.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value3.2 s
74/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.086
93/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
144 ms
362 ms
173 ms
1139 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Online-project-management.bestreviews.net, 13% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Online-project-management.bestreviews.net.
Page size can be reduced by 367.4 kB (64%)
577.0 kB
209.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Online-project-management.bestreviews.net main page is 577.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 255.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 135.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Online Project Management Best Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 160.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 160.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Online-project-management.bestreviews.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 67.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (68%)
71
23
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Online Project Management Best Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
online-project-management.bestreviews.net
144 ms
online-project-management.bestreviews.net
362 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
173 ms
myrp-hotlink-css.php
1139 ms
jquery.rating.css
154 ms
global.css
160 ms
style.css
162 ms
css
170 ms
jquery.js
153 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
159 ms
myrp-hotlink-js.php
835 ms
jquery.MetaData.js
167 ms
jquery.rating.pack.js
168 ms
jtip.js
158 ms
tw-sack.min.js
158 ms
conversion.js
144 ms
box-shortcodes.css
157 ms
content-shortcodes.css
157 ms
comment-reply.min.js
150 ms
wp-embed.min.js
165 ms
analytics.js
96 ms
cool-stars.png
64 ms
icon-search.png
64 ms
icon-li.png
61 ms
icon-li-footer.png
61 ms
logo.png
234 ms
wrike.png
234 ms
proofhub-logo.png
232 ms
basecamp-logo.png
403 ms
podio-logo.png
387 ms
zoho-projects.png
402 ms
5pm-project-management.png
582 ms
projectmanager-com-logo.png
514 ms
clarizen-logo.png
568 ms
liquidplanner.png
581 ms
clientspot-logo.png
592 ms
all.js
611 ms
plusone.js
236 ms
widgets.js
273 ms
pinit.js
264 ms
210 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
188 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
196 ms
collect
44 ms
112 ms
collect
122 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
54 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
80 ms
badge
162 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
51 ms
pinit_main.js
62 ms
postmessageRelay
46 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
61 ms
api.js
56 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
89 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
104 ms
rs=AGLTcCONB88yPaIDnHqqFySk-Ex4kFPryw
28 ms
rs=AGLTcCNVayw58ATXmq5na_KkaQDUov7ewA
37 ms
rs=AGLTcCNDCD2FX1GmFI4h9QOi1JonWtDyWA
88 ms
photo.jpg
134 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
86 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
86 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
87 ms
rs=AGLTcCNDCD2FX1GmFI4h9QOi1JonWtDyWA
24 ms
jot
108 ms
rs=AGLTcCNDCD2FX1GmFI4h9QOi1JonWtDyWA
17 ms
37 ms
xd_arbiter.php
429 ms
like_box.php
56 ms
xYm_UD1pmAz.css
283 ms
TGpOWuX6Pv8.css
350 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
486 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
615 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
507 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
483 ms
1925306_626185394128937_1134492059_n.png
280 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
78 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
75 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
69 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
73 ms
online-project-management.bestreviews.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
online-project-management.bestreviews.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
online-project-management.bestreviews.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Online-project-management.bestreviews.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Online-project-management.bestreviews.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
online-project-management.bestreviews.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Online Project Management Best Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: