Tools & Wizards About Us
python.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

python.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

40.9 sec in total

First Response

14.1 sec

Resources Loaded

26.4 sec

Page Rendered

392 ms

python.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Welcome to python.bookmarking.site homepage info - get ready to check Python Bookmarking best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about python.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit python.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Python.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 14.1 sec and then it took 26.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

python.bookmarking.site performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,420 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

python.bookmarking.site

14058 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

940 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

328 ms

font-awesome.min.css

25 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

825 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Python.bookmarking.site, 11% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (17 sec) belongs to the original domain Python.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 101.5 kB (23%)

Content Size

450.2 kB

After Optimization

348.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Python.bookmarking.site main page is 450.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 166.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 84.1 kB

  • Original 100.7 kB
  • After minification 80.9 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.8 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 47 B

  • Original 143.3 kB
  • After minification 143.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Python Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 166.6 kB
  • After minification 166.6 kB
  • After compression 160.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Python.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (76%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Python Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

python.bookmarking.site

python.bookmarking.site

14058 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

940 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

328 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

25 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

825 ms

style.css

style.css

1357 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

354 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1682 ms

js

js

88 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1730 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

827 ms

custom.js

custom.js

2626 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

16952 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

2707 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

643 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

15183 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

47 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

89 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

86 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

321 ms

139211_32.jpg

139211_32.jpg

2588 ms

js

js

60 ms

collect

collect

73 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

73 ms

collect

collect

51 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

collect

collect

4 ms

collect

collect

5 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

14101 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

14117 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

43 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

9 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

13 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

753 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

334 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

619 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

889 ms

139210_32.jpg

139210_32.jpg

1014 ms

139058_32.jpg

139058_32.jpg

1138 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

315 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

315 ms

Accessibility Review

python.bookmarking.site accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

python.bookmarking.site best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

python.bookmarking.site SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Python.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Python.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

python.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Python Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: