Tools & Wizards About Us
smo.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

smo.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

600 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

326 ms

smo.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Visit smo.bookmarking.site now to see the best up-to-date Smo Bookmarking content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about smo.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit smo.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Smo.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 600 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smo.bookmarking.site performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smo.bookmarking.site

600 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

77 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

187 ms

font-awesome.min.css

175 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Smo.bookmarking.site, 12% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (807 ms) belongs to the original domain Smo.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 96.4 kB (23%)

Content Size

412.6 kB

After Optimization

316.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Smo.bookmarking.site main page is 412.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 155.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 82.9 kB

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 78.7 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 397 B

  • Original 118.9 kB
  • After minification 118.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smo Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 155.8 kB
  • After minification 155.8 kB
  • After compression 153.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smo.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (65%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smo Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

smo.bookmarking.site

smo.bookmarking.site

600 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

77 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

187 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

175 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

185 ms

style.css

style.css

26 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

189 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

custom.js

custom.js

224 ms

js

js

44 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

326 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

177 ms

custom.js

custom.js

431 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

490 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

492 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

324 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

36 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

14 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

15 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

367 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

427 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

484 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

516 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

261 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

65 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

66 ms

vday.jpg

vday.jpg

253 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

255 ms

132884_32.jpg

132884_32.jpg

255 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

489 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

59 ms

js

js

84 ms

collect

collect

130 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

522 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

807 ms

collect

collect

65 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

308 ms

Accessibility Review

smo.bookmarking.site accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

smo.bookmarking.site best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

smo.bookmarking.site SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smo.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smo.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

smo.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Smo Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: