Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

static.beaute-test.com

Beauté Test - guide d'achat, avis beauté, parfum et cosmétique

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

429 ms

static.beaute-test.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Static Beaute Test content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about static.beaute-test.com

Le site de référence dans l'univers de la beauté et des cosmétiques. Découvrez les nouvelles tendances, les nouveautés des plus grandes marques et les produits populaires du moment décryptés par ...

Visit static.beaute-test.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Static.beaute-test.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

static.beaute-test.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value33,060 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value45.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

static.beaute-test.com

118 ms

www.beaute-test.com

650 ms

loader.js

29 ms

sdk.d8d9b3b0f63d7d5011309533a99e82ca765fcbd8.js

5 ms

style-2fd7a8c669.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Static.beaute-test.com, 73% (44 requests) were made to Beaute-test.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (937 ms) relates to the external source Btstats.devtribu.fr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 82.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

944.5 kB

After Optimization

861.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Static.beaute-test.com main page is 944.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 696.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 73.9 kB

  • Original 96.8 kB
  • After minification 92.5 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 696.1 kB
  • After minification 687.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Static Beaute Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 220 B

  • Original 58.9 kB
  • After minification 58.9 kB
  • After compression 58.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 259 B

  • Original 92.7 kB
  • After minification 92.7 kB
  • After compression 92.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Static.beaute-test.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Static Beaute Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

static.beaute-test.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

static.beaute-test.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

static.beaute-test.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Static.beaute-test.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Static.beaute-test.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Static Beaute Test. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: