Tools & Wizards About Us
treatments.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

treatments.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

329 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

240 ms

treatments.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Welcome to treatments.bookmarking.site homepage info - get ready to check Treatments Bookmarking best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about treatments.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit treatments.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Treatments.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 329 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

treatments.bookmarking.site performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,880 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

treatments.bookmarking.site

329 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

261 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

28 ms

font-awesome.min.css

173 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Treatments.bookmarking.site, 16% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (380 ms) belongs to the original domain Treatments.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.5 kB (36%)

Content Size

276.8 kB

After Optimization

176.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Treatments.bookmarking.site main page is 276.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 136.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 82.7 kB

  • Original 97.5 kB
  • After minification 77.7 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.8 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 397 B

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Treatments Bookmarking needs image optimization as it can save up to 397 B or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 136.2 kB
  • After minification 136.2 kB
  • After compression 129.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Treatments.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (66%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Treatments Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

treatments.bookmarking.site

treatments.bookmarking.site

329 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

261 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

28 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

173 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

219 ms

style.css

style.css

20 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

176 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

27 ms

custom.js

custom.js

181 ms

js

js

58 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

72 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

210 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

27 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

7 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

9 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

306 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

307 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

307 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

380 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

40 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

41 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

38 ms

128202_32.jpg

128202_32.jpg

38 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

53 ms

js

js

33 ms

collect

collect

78 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

309 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

Accessibility Review

treatments.bookmarking.site accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

treatments.bookmarking.site best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

treatments.bookmarking.site SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Treatments.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Treatments.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

treatments.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Treatments Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: