Tools & Wizards About Us
trust.brandprotect.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

trust.brandprotect.com

The Leader in Digital Risk Protection | Intelligence & Mitigation

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

842 ms

Page Rendered

298 ms

trust.brandprotect.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Trust Brandprotect content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trust.brandprotect.com

PhishLabs provides Digital Risk Protection through curated threat intelligence and complete mitigation for web, social, and email threats.

Visit trust.brandprotect.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trust.brandprotect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trust.brandprotect.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,620 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

info.phishlabs.com

18 ms

www.phishlabs.com

58 ms

css_Qw9Ma3kkod8nuYhntImeL_UWiDsKDJmPtJeBCEN1Ho0.css

22 ms

css_Sj6AeUeZWS9XGLQpKyNMQEt1IrhwQUcdxeykmS9v-2o.css

39 ms

css_5zF6MJ8OCFzGwtTiDMq79vnf-c8hKQK3X1sBWWgxdjE.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Trust.brandprotect.com, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (300 ms) relates to the external source Static.fortra.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 166.0 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trust.brandprotect.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 513.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 60.3 kB

  • Original 76.6 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 54.3 kB

  • Original 513.0 kB
  • After minification 458.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trust Brandprotect needs image optimization as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 17.0 kB

  • Original 480.5 kB
  • After minification 479.6 kB
  • After compression 463.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 165.5 kB
  • After minification 165.5 kB
  • After compression 131.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trust.brandprotect.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (63%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trust Brandprotect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

info.phishlabs.com

info.phishlabs.com

18 ms

www.phishlabs.com

www.phishlabs.com

58 ms

css_Qw9Ma3kkod8nuYhntImeL_UWiDsKDJmPtJeBCEN1Ho0.css

css_Qw9Ma3kkod8nuYhntImeL_UWiDsKDJmPtJeBCEN1Ho0.css

22 ms

css_Sj6AeUeZWS9XGLQpKyNMQEt1IrhwQUcdxeykmS9v-2o.css

css_Sj6AeUeZWS9XGLQpKyNMQEt1IrhwQUcdxeykmS9v-2o.css

39 ms

css_5zF6MJ8OCFzGwtTiDMq79vnf-c8hKQK3X1sBWWgxdjE.css

css_5zF6MJ8OCFzGwtTiDMq79vnf-c8hKQK3X1sBWWgxdjE.css

51 ms

notice

notice

199 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

29 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

21 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

43 ms

once.min.js

once.min.js

49 ms

drupalSettingsLoader.js

drupalSettingsLoader.js

44 ms

drupal.js

drupal.js

79 ms

drupal.init.js

drupal.init.js

80 ms

page.js

page.js

42 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

83 ms

accessible-nav.js

accessible-nav.js

80 ms

faqs.js

faqs.js

82 ms

stacktable.js

stacktable.js

82 ms

global.js

global.js

82 ms

iframeResizer.min.js

iframeResizer.min.js

81 ms

pardot-iframe.js

pardot-iframe.js

86 ms

widget.js

widget.js

198 ms

widget-code.js

widget-code.js

197 ms

barrio.js

barrio.js

195 ms

affix.js

affix.js

196 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

198 ms

global.js

global.js

198 ms

better_exposed_filters.js

better_exposed_filters.js

218 ms

debounce.js

debounce.js

218 ms

auto_submit.js

auto_submit.js

217 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

218 ms

css2

css2

48 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

262 ms

fortra-logo-full.svg

fortra-logo-full.svg

300 ms

edn8z6pzlh

edn8z6pzlh

96 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

107 ms

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

231 ms

fortra-logo-small.svg

fortra-logo-small.svg

289 ms

fta-phishlabs-light.svg

fta-phishlabs-light.svg

103 ms

top-brand-threats-and-defense-tactics-mockup.png

top-brand-threats-and-defense-tactics-mockup.png

103 ms

fta-phishlabs-header.jpg

fta-phishlabs-header.jpg

234 ms

fta-pl-platform-mini.png

fta-pl-platform-mini.png

225 ms

our-platform1-test-image-03_1.png

our-platform1-test-image-03_1.png

104 ms

threat-specific1_0.png

threat-specific1_0.png

104 ms

logo-gpi-21.png

logo-gpi-21.png

225 ms

badges_2023_gold.png

badges_2023_gold.png

225 ms

rating1.png

rating1.png

224 ms

top-brand-threats-and-defense-tactics-mockup.png

top-brand-threats-and-defense-tactics-mockup.png

224 ms

fta-domain-protection-best-practices-webinar-800x454.jpg

fta-domain-protection-best-practices-webinar-800x454.jpg

266 ms

executive_attacks_on_social_media_hit_all-time_high_as_analysts_point_to_ai.png

executive_attacks_on_social_media_hit_all-time_high_as_analysts_point_to_ai.png

269 ms

phishlabs_blog_thumbnail.png

phishlabs_blog_thumbnail.png

266 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

267 ms

iframeApi.js

iframeApi.js

34 ms

log

log

155 ms

get

get

159 ms

v1.7-230

v1.7-230

164 ms

swatch

swatch

151 ms

insideIframe.js

insideIframe.js

20 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJDUdVNF.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJDUdVNF.ttf

55 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1tvEv-L.ttf

74 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1tvEv-L.ttf

99 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1tvEv-L.ttf

99 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1tvEv-L.ttf

142 ms

fa-sharp-solid-900.ttf

fa-sharp-solid-900.ttf

139 ms

fa-sharp-regular-400.ttf

fa-sharp-regular-400.ttf

166 ms

fa-sharp-light-300.ttf

fa-sharp-light-300.ttf

168 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

141 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

198 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

118 ms

flashPlayer.js

flashPlayer.js

57 ms

videoThumbnail.js

videoThumbnail.js

48 ms

chapters.js

chapters.js

52 ms

postRoll-v2.js

postRoll-v2.js

49 ms

captions.js

captions.js

50 ms

midrollLink-v2.js

midrollLink-v2.js

8 ms

css_DR-zuREHpHXFs1hzI3jNWXgi0tkxvJSzOLSOk00QWG8.css

css_DR-zuREHpHXFs1hzI3jNWXgi0tkxvJSzOLSOk00QWG8.css

38 ms

Accessibility Review

trust.brandprotect.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

trust.brandprotect.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

trust.brandprotect.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trust.brandprotect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trust.brandprotect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trust.brandprotect.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Trust Brandprotect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: