Tools & Wizards About Us
web-design.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

web-design.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2021

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

464 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

web-design.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Welcome to web-design.bookmarking.site homepage info - get ready to check Web Design Bookmarking best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about web-design.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit web-design.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Web-design.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 464 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

web-design.bookmarking.site performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

web-design.bookmarking.site

464 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

246 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

167 ms

font-awesome.min.css

176 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Web-design.bookmarking.site, 16% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (464 ms) belongs to the original domain Web-design.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 130.6 kB (43%)

Content Size

303.6 kB

After Optimization

173.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Web-design.bookmarking.site main page is 303.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 165.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 82.3 kB

  • Original 96.5 kB
  • After minification 77.1 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Design Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

  • Original 165.3 kB
  • After minification 165.3 kB
  • After compression 128.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Web-design.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (68%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Design Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

web-design.bookmarking.site

web-design.bookmarking.site

464 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

246 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

167 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

176 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

169 ms

style.css

style.css

172 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

223 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

custom.js

custom.js

339 ms

js

js

105 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

172 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

41 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

11 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

17 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

270 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

272 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

269 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

328 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

238 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

46 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

47 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

249 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

104 ms

js

js

177 ms

collect

collect

142 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

365 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

Accessibility Review

web-design.bookmarking.site accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

web-design.bookmarking.site best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

web-design.bookmarking.site SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Web-design.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Web-design.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

web-design.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Design Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: