Tools & Wizards About Us
win.bookmarking.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

win.bookmarking.site

Quality Dofollow Social Bookmarking Sites List 2020

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

542 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

364 ms

win.bookmarking.site screenshot

About Website

Visit win.bookmarking.site now to see the best up-to-date Win Bookmarking content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about win.bookmarking.site

iPt.pw is an open source content management system that lets you easily <a href='http://iPt.pw'>create your own user-powered website</a>.

Visit win.bookmarking.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Win.bookmarking.site page load time and found that the first response time was 542 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

win.bookmarking.site performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

win.bookmarking.site

542 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

239 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

15 ms

font-awesome.min.css

173 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Win.bookmarking.site, 53% (48 requests) were made to I.imgur.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (542 ms) belongs to the original domain Win.bookmarking.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.5 kB (25%)

Content Size

465.6 kB

After Optimization

349.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Win.bookmarking.site main page is 465.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 166.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 98.7 kB

  • Original 116.3 kB
  • After minification 95.8 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 441 B

  • Original 143.1 kB
  • After minification 142.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Win Bookmarking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 166.6 kB
  • After minification 166.6 kB
  • After compression 160.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Win.bookmarking.site needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (89%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Win Bookmarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

win.bookmarking.site

win.bookmarking.site

542 ms

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

bootstrap.no-icons.min.css

239 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

15 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

173 ms

jquery.pnotify.css

jquery.pnotify.css

199 ms

style.css

style.css

168 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

170 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

custom.js

custom.js

221 ms

js

js

132 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

348 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

173 ms

custom.js

custom.js

365 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

395 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

374 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

27 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

6 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

11 ms

registration_verify.js

registration_verify.js

312 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

331 ms

bootstrap-fileupload.js

bootstrap-fileupload.js

447 ms

jquery.pnotify.min.js

jquery.pnotify.min.js

464 ms

my-style.css

my-style.css

363 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

256 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

465 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

298 ms

error_404.php

error_404.php

518 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

62 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

151 ms

Avatar_32.png

Avatar_32.png

179 ms

124901_32.jpg

124901_32.jpg

178 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

86 ms

js

js

78 ms

collect

collect

57 ms

removed.png

removed.png

111 ms

removed.png

removed.png

104 ms

removed.png

removed.png

104 ms

removed.png

removed.png

94 ms

collect

collect

63 ms

removed.png

removed.png

93 ms

collect

collect

52 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

removed.png

removed.png

72 ms

removed.png

removed.png

71 ms

removed.png

removed.png

72 ms

removed.png

removed.png

72 ms

removed.png

removed.png

73 ms

removed.png

removed.png

72 ms

removed.png

removed.png

72 ms

removed.png

removed.png

72 ms

removed.png

removed.png

73 ms

removed.png

removed.png

73 ms

removed.png

removed.png

55 ms

removed.png

removed.png

54 ms

removed.png

removed.png

54 ms

removed.png

removed.png

55 ms

removed.png

removed.png

55 ms

removed.png

removed.png

55 ms

removed.png

removed.png

54 ms

removed.png

removed.png

55 ms

removed.png

removed.png

55 ms

removed.png

removed.png

54 ms

removed.png

removed.png

44 ms

removed.png

removed.png

44 ms

removed.png

removed.png

36 ms

removed.png

removed.png

32 ms

removed.png

removed.png

25 ms

removed.png

removed.png

23 ms

removed.png

removed.png

24 ms

removed.png

removed.png

47 ms

removed.png

removed.png

47 ms

removed.png

removed.png

39 ms

removed.png

removed.png

29 ms

removed.png

removed.png

30 ms

removed.png

removed.png

29 ms

removed.png

removed.png

21 ms

removed.png

removed.png

21 ms

removed.png

removed.png

18 ms

removed.png

removed.png

18 ms

removed.png

removed.png

9 ms

removed.png

removed.png

8 ms

removed.png

removed.png

7 ms

removed.png

removed.png

2 ms

removed.png

removed.png

2 ms

removed.png

removed.png

2 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

300 ms

Accessibility Review

win.bookmarking.site accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

win.bookmarking.site best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

win.bookmarking.site SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Win.bookmarking.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Win.bookmarking.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

win.bookmarking.site

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Win Bookmarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: