Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

894 ms

Page Rendered

272 ms

beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com screenshot

About Website

Visit beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com now to see the best up-to-date Beautybrandsigns Collaterate content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com

Visit beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loginOrRegister

42 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.5.custom.css

12 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css

17 ms

colorbox.css

29 ms

global.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com, 20% (6 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (474 ms) relates to the external source Fast.fonts.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 285.3 kB (66%)

Content Size

433.6 kB

After Optimization

148.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com main page is 433.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 200.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 25.1 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 50.9 kB
  • After minification 50.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beautybrandsigns Collaterate images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 96.7 kB

  • Original 156.9 kB
  • After minification 144.1 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.7 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 172.0 kB

  • Original 200.8 kB
  • After minification 162.9 kB
  • After compression 28.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 172.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (77%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautybrandsigns Collaterate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Beautybrandsigns.collaterate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautybrandsigns Collaterate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: