Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz

Magazine Discount Center

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

251 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

396 ms

biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz screenshot

About Website

Welcome to biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz homepage info - get ready to check Biblical Archaeology Review Com Sub best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz

Biblical Archaeology Review Magazine Subscriptions, Renewals, and Gifts Options at Discounted Prices. Risk Free 90-Day Money Back Guarantee!

Visit biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz

Key Findings

We analyzed Biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.867

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz

251 ms

37 ms

168 ms

54 ms

productpage.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz, 3% (2 requests) were made to Seal.thawte.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (435 ms) relates to the external source Bat.bing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 105.5 kB (34%)

Content Size

314.2 kB

After Optimization

208.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz main page is 314.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 158.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 69.8 kB

  • Original 83.8 kB
  • After minification 55.8 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.0 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 158.9 kB
  • After minification 135.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Biblical Archaeology Review Com Sub needs image optimization as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 57.7 kB
  • After minification 56.9 kB
  • After compression 55.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 13.8 kB
  • After minification 13.7 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (30%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Biblical Archaeology Review Com Sub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Biblical-archaeology-review.com-sub.biz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Biblical Archaeology Review Com Sub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: