Tools & Wizards About Us
birds.comparespecies.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

birds.comparespecies.com

Types of Birds | List of Birds | Similar Birds Comparison | Kind of Birds

Page Load Speed

727 ms in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

484 ms

Page Rendered

190 ms

birds.comparespecies.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Birds Comparespecies content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about birds.comparespecies.com

There are numerous types of birds that can be identified from their unique features. Here you will find information about different kind of birds in detail.

Visit birds.comparespecies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Birds.comparespecies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 674 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

birds.comparespecies.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,650 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

birds.comparespecies.com

53 ms

birds.comparespecies.com

155 ms

adsbygoogle.js

222 ms

analytics.js

47 ms

Search.png

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Birds.comparespecies.com, 12% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 179.0 kB (75%)

Content Size

237.2 kB

After Optimization

58.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Birds.comparespecies.com main page is 237.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 202.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 175.4 kB

  • Original 202.2 kB
  • After minification 153.6 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 48.6 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 175.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 14.0 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Birds Comparespecies needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Birds Comparespecies. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

birds.comparespecies.com

birds.comparespecies.com

53 ms

birds.comparespecies.com

birds.comparespecies.com

155 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

222 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

47 ms

Search.png

Search.png

96 ms

load.jpg

load.jpg

97 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

100 ms

share.png

share.png

92 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

93 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

96 ms

reddit.png

reddit.png

95 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

93 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

95 ms

email.png

email.png

105 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

105 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

js

js

50 ms

Accessibility Review

birds.comparespecies.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

birds.comparespecies.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

birds.comparespecies.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Birds.comparespecies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Birds.comparespecies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

birds.comparespecies.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Birds Comparespecies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: