859 ms in total
84 ms
705 ms
70 ms
Welcome to c-m.com homepage info - get ready to check C M best content right away, or after learning these important things about c-m.com
At Cesari and McKenna, we combine deep technical expertise with decades of legal knowledge to provide comprehensive and cost-effective intellectual property law solutions.
Visit c-m.comWe analyzed C-m.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 775 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
c-m.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
65/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value3.7 s
86/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
84 ms
35 ms
33 ms
28 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original C-m.com, 34% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (409 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 566.5 kB (52%)
1.1 MB
515.1 kB
In fact, the total size of C-m.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 446.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 321.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 321.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, C M needs image optimization as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 189.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 189.6 kB or 43% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)
26
16
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of C M. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.c-m.com
84 ms
minified.js
35 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
33 ms
polyfill.min.js
28 ms
thunderbolt-commons.8230b7cf.bundle.min.js
123 ms
main.fa25aea8.bundle.min.js
123 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
24 ms
lodash.min.js
122 ms
react.production.min.js
123 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
126 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
124 ms
C-M%20Updated%20Logo%20Drafts%20V2%20(10)_edited.png
231 ms
bundle.min.js
68 ms
11062b_b8f54a47fba14e8d82bb5a334f95b0bc~mv2.jpg
144 ms
a1e30b_fc8b30036fdd4c7ab96a03b538ed9df7~mv2.jpg
311 ms
a1e30b_ec11290b1ad94de89e1b8a976e531b8a~mv2.jpg
218 ms
a1e30b_3e59ed7e0fe249daa0084bc4a6ff7cc3~mv2.jpg
193 ms
a1e30b_2f2a1b300c4e4e2e9323de9331b20651~mv2.png
238 ms
a1e30b_084b9cd299d3409287f26a7223e7ad0a~mv2.jpg
291 ms
TM%20logo%20-%20transparent%20background.png
334 ms
a1e30b_90787c723f404306b2490631819eb537~mv2.png
389 ms
a1e30b_920ecab8803b4e039d0318c3d65a9f36~mv2.png
409 ms
C-M%20Updated%20Logo%20Drafts%20V2%20(8)_edited.png
394 ms
103 ms
99 ms
100 ms
99 ms
93 ms
96 ms
135 ms
130 ms
130 ms
131 ms
125 ms
126 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
4 ms
AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff
10 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
19 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
4 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
c-m.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
c-m.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
c-m.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise C-m.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that C-m.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
c-m.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of C M. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: