8.6 sec in total
905 ms
7.1 sec
676 ms
Welcome to cachexinol.com homepage info - get ready to check Cachexinol best content right away, or after learning these important things about cachexinol.com
What is Cachexinol? Using Cachexinol for Treatment of Cachexia. Cachexinol Break Through Cachexia Treatment significantly increases survival!
Visit cachexinol.comWe analyzed Cachexinol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 905 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
cachexinol.com performance score
905 ms
147 ms
122 ms
145 ms
145 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Cachexinol.com, 18% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 298.4 kB (38%)
786.3 kB
487.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Cachexinol.com main page is 786.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 268.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cachexinol needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.4 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 94.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.5 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cachexinol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.0 kB or 32% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (81%)
52
10
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cachexinol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cachexinol.com
905 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
147 ms
style.min.css
122 ms
simple-sitemap.css
145 ms
styles.css
145 ms
nectar-slider.css
106 ms
style.css
280 ms
font-awesome.min.css
312 ms
grid-system.css
307 ms
style.css
152 ms
magnific.css
305 ms
css
331 ms
responsive.css
270 ms
skin-material.css
279 ms
js_composer.min.css
405 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
362 ms
css
348 ms
jquery.js
335 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
334 ms
js
522 ms
adsbygoogle.js
346 ms
css
345 ms
scripts.js
334 ms
anime.js
327 ms
nectar-slider.js
693 ms
salient-social.js
642 ms
jquery.easing.js
337 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
339 ms
priority.js
687 ms
transit.js
502 ms
waypoints.js
502 ms
modernizr.js
689 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
689 ms
hoverintent.js
503 ms
magnific.js
504 ms
superfish.js
657 ms
init.js
659 ms
touchswipe.min.js
638 ms
wp-embed.min.js
661 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
661 ms
logo-s.png
253 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
321 ms
pat1.png
317 ms
m3.jpg
317 ms
show_ads_impl.js
242 ms
zrt_lookup.html
254 ms
analytics.js
672 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
840 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
1011 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e0.ttf
4887 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
4896 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
4892 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
4894 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
4893 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
4889 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
482 ms
cookie.js
4559 ms
integrator.js
4479 ms
ads
371 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
4043 ms
collect
3905 ms
ajax-loader.gif
344 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
270 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
278 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
278 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
278 ms
sodar
36 ms
cachexinol.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cachexinol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cachexinol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cachexinol.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cachexinol. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: